Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition
- PMID: 16097222
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[540:STEPBT]2.0.CO;2
Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition
Abstract
This prospective clinical investigation evaluates the dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric changes produced by the Herbst appliance during treatment of mixed dentition patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Thirty individuals (15 male and 15 female individuals; initial mean age nine years 10 months) were treated with the Herbst appliance for a period of 12 months. For comparison, the records of 30 untreated Class II children (15 boys, 15 girls; initial mean age nine years eight months) were followed without treatment for a period of 12 months. The results indicated that the treatment effects produced in the mixed dentition patients were primarily dentoalveolar in nature. The mandibular incisors were tipped labially, and the maxillary incisors were retruded; a significant increase in mandibular posterior dentoalveolar height occurred, and there was a restriction in the vertical development of the maxillary molars. There was no difference in the forward growth of the maxilla between the two groups. In comparison with the controls, however, the Herbst treatment produced a modest but statistically significant increase in total mandibular length. This increase in total mandibular length, however, was less than that observed in adolescent Herbst patients in other studies.
Similar articles
-
Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):210-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.036. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21803259
-
Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2002 Oct;72(5):418-25. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0418:TEPBFA>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2002. PMID: 12401050
-
Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):822-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.021. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19962605 Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):361-9. doi: 10.2319/031107-123.1. Angle Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18251608 Review.
-
Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition.Semin Orthod. 1996 Jun;2(2):114-37. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(96)80048-x. Semin Orthod. 1996. PMID: 9161275 Review.
Cited by
-
Stability of Class II Malocclusion Treatment with the Austro Repositioner Followed by Fixed Appliances in Brachyfacial Patients.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 17;18(18):9793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189793. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34574718 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):113-26. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv034. Epub 2015 May 19. Eur J Orthod. 2016. PMID: 25995359 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of the Herbst and Begg appliance in the management of severe Class II malocclusion.Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):528-31. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.142825. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014. PMID: 25395773 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment effects of Herbst appliance in skeletal Class II cases during pre-pubertal and post-pubertal periods: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 13;13(1):11342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37394-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37443323 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions.Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1237-y. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Clin Oral Investig. 2015. PMID: 24687248