Buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: methods and design of the COBRA study
- PMID: 16097397
- PMCID: PMC6878433
- DOI: 10.1002/mpr.14
Buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: methods and design of the COBRA study
Abstract
Buprenorphine and methadone are the two established substitution drugs licensed in many countries for the treatment of opioid dependence. Little is known, however, about how these two drugs are applied and how they work in clinical practice. In this paper we present the aims, methods, design and sampling issues of a collaborative multi-stage epidemiological study (COBRA) to address these issues. Based on a nationally representative sample of substitution physicians, the study is designed as an observational, naturalistic study, consisting of three major parts. The first part was a national survey of substitution doctors (prestudy, n = 379 doctors). The second part was a cross-sectional study (n = 223 doctors), which consisted of a target-week assessment of 2,694 consecutive patients to determine (a) the severity and problem profiles and treatment targets; (b) the choice and dosage scheme of the substitution drug; (c) past and current interventions, including treatment of comorbid hepatitis C; and (d) cross-sectional differences between the two drugs with regard to comorbidity, clinical course, acceptance/compliance and social integration. The third part consists of a prospective-longitudinal cohort study of 48 methadone-treated and 48 buprenorphine-treated patients. The cohort is followed up over a period of 12 months to investigate whether course and outcome of the patients differ by type or treatment received in terms of clinical, psychosocial, pharmaco-economic and other related measures. The response rate among substitution doctors was 57.1%; that among eligible patients was 71.7%. Comparisons with the federal registers reveal that the final samples of doctors and patients may be considered nationally representative with regard to regional distribution, training, type of setting as well as the frequency of patients treated with buprenorphine or methadone. The COBRA study provides a unique comprehensive database, informing about the natural allocation and intervention processes in routine care and about the course and outcome of patients treated with buprenorphine or methadone.
Similar articles
-
Depression and Outcomes of Methadone and Buprenorphine Treatment Among People with Opioid Use Disorders: A Literature Review.J Dual Diagn. 2020 Apr-Jun;16(2):191-207. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1726549. Epub 2020 Feb 23. J Dual Diagn. 2020. PMID: 32089124 Review.
-
One-year mortality rates of patients receiving methadone and buprenorphine maintenance therapy: a nationally representative cohort study in 2694 patients.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;26(6):657-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000245561.99036.49. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006. PMID: 17110826
-
[Buprenorphine vs. methadone as maintenance treatment for opioid dependence].Nervenarzt. 1999 Sep;70(9):795-802. doi: 10.1007/s001150050514. Nervenarzt. 1999. PMID: 10522247 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: self-reports, urinalysis, and addiction severity index.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Feb;16(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199602000-00010. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996. PMID: 8834420 Clinical Trial.
-
Maintenance agonist treatments for opiate-dependent pregnant women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11(11):CD006318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006318.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33165953 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
[Insufficient involvement of psychiatrists in substitution treatment].Nervenarzt. 2006 Nov;77(11):1368-72. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2149-0. Nervenarzt. 2006. PMID: 17024480 German.
-
Retention in Georgia opioid substitution therapy program and associated factors.Harm Reduct J. 2016 Dec 8;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12954-016-0124-z. Harm Reduct J. 2016. PMID: 27931232 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol and drug treatment systems in public health perspective: mediators and moderators of population effects.Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jun;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50-9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.249. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008. PMID: 18543363 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F. (eds). The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status using EQ‐5D: A European Perspective. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
-
- Carey KB, Purnine DM, Maisto SA, Carey MP. Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: A critical review of instruments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 1999; 6: 245–366.
-
- Christl B, Gerlach R. Fragebogen für substituierende Ärzte/Ärztinnen (Methadone‐Buprenorphine staff questionnaire. Caplehorn JRM 2002). Dresden: Technical University Dresden, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2003.
-
- Farell M, Howes S, Verster A, Davoli M, Solberg U, Greenwood G, Robertson K. (eds). Reviewing Current Practice in Drug‐substitution Treatment in the European Union. Insights 3, EMCDDA Series. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000.
-
- Gerra G, Borella F, Zaimovic A, Moi G, Bussandri M, Bubici C, Bertacca S. Buprenorphine versus methadone for opioid dependence: predictor variables for treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 75(1): 37–45. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous