'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups
- PMID: 16098151
- PMCID: PMC5060292
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x
'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups--collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users--in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.
Design: A qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis.
Participants and setting: Thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews.
Results and conclusions: Partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures.
Similar articles
-
Interprofessional collaboration with service users in the development of cancer services: the Cancer Partnership Project.J Interprof Care. 2006 Jan;20(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/13561820500515304. J Interprof Care. 2006. PMID: 16581640
-
From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):195-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00334.x. Health Expect. 2005. PMID: 16098150 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: availability, characteristics and presentation.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 27;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-45. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18304315 Free PMC article.
-
[Regional cancers networks, collaborative work in adults and pediatricians].Bull Cancer. 2021 Feb;108(2):159-162. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Bull Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33198952 Review. French.
-
User and carer involvement in the training and education of health professionals: a review of the literature.Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):511-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007. PMID: 16842793 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review.Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):969-984. doi: 10.1177/0269216319858247. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Palliat Med. 2019. PMID: 31250702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world.Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):275-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x. Health Expect. 2009. PMID: 19754691 Free PMC article.
-
Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies.Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):81-91. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu022. Epub 2014 Mar 9. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014. PMID: 24615596 Free PMC article.
-
Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):159-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00627.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Health Expect. 2011. PMID: 21029279 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36917094 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Her Majesty's Government. The NHS Plan . A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: HMSO, 2000.
-
- HMSO . Health and Social Care Act 2001. London: HMSO, 2001.
-
- HMSO . National Health Service Reform and Health Care Professions Act 2002. London: HMSO, 2002.
-
- Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales . A Policy Framework For Commissioning Cancer Services. London: Department of Health, 1995.
-
- Department of Health . National Cancer Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. London: Department of Health, 2000.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous