Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;8(3):253-63.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00337.x.

Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands

Affiliations

Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands

J Francisca Caron-Flinterman et al. Health Expect. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Although patients are increasingly involved in agenda setting within specific fields of health research, they rarely participate in decision-making on the entire breadth of health research, including biomedical research. This might be attributable to a widely held view that patients are incapable of adequate research prioritization due to a lack of relevant knowledge, a failure to look beyond their own individual problems or an inability to objectively consider long-term targets.

Aims: By conducting transparent and structured consultations with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients regarding their health research priorities, we aim to assess the ability of patients to prioritize research in a well-argued way.

Methods: Patients were consulted through seven focus groups, a feedback meeting, and a questionnaire. The focus groups and the feedback meeting aimed to explore the entire breadth of patients' problems experienced in relation to their diseases, while the questionnaire aimed to investigate patients' prioritization of possible research targets focused on solving these problems.

Results: The focus groups produced a wide range of problems, including those related to health-care organization, social environment, therapy and costs. In terms of research prioritization, patients focused primarily on biomedical issues, particularly aetiology, co-morbidity and effective medication.

Conclusions: The consultation procedure successfully elicited patients' research priorities including the underlying arguments. Our results indicate that asthma and COPD patients are capable of research prioritization in a well-argued way and that they highly value biomedical research. Furthermore, as they prioritized some research topics that are not covered by current Dutch research programmes, we argue that patient participation can broaden research agenda setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Highly simplified version of the causal tree reflecting problem(cluster)s experienced by asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and their mutual relations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of questionnaire respondents along age categories, diseases and levels of education.

References

    1. Ong BN, Hooper H. Involving users in low back pain research. Health Expectations, 2003; 6: 332–341. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 2001; 322: 519–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Telford R, Beverley CA, Cooper CL, Boote JD. Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction? British Journal of Clinical Governance, 2002; 7: 92–103.
    1. Oliver S, Clarke‐Jones L, Rees R et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence‐based approach. Health Technology Assessment, 2004, 8: 1–148. - PubMed
    1. Stevens T, Wilde D, Hunt J, Ahmedzai SH. Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research. Health Expectations, 2003; 6: 81–88. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types