Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor
- PMID: 16098859
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.011
Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor
Abstract
Objective: Precise determination of fetal head position in labor is a prerequisite for safe instrumental deliveries, and essential for the assessment of labor progress. Recent studies have cast serious doubts on the accuracy of the time-honored digital vaginal examination (DVE) in comparison to transabdominal ultrasound scans (TUS). However, transabdominal imaging is technically difficult with a deeply engaged fetal head in the second stage of labor. We examined the accuracy and time requirements of transvaginal scans (TVS) in the second stage of labor for determination of fetal head position.
Study design: Sixty laboring women in the second stage of labor with a deeply engaged fetal head were examined by experienced nurse midwives and senior residents. Fetal head position was recorded as "time on a 12-hour clock." Subsequently, TUS and TVS were independently performed by a skilled sonographer. Accuracy and time requirements for all 3 examinations were recorded.
Results: Fetal head position could be determined in all cases by TVS, but not in 7 cases and 9 cases by DVE and TUS, respectively (P < .03; P < .008). A discrepancy of 60 degrees or more between the DVE and TUS or TVS was found in 13/60 cases (21.7%) and 14/60 cases (23.3%), respectively. A > or = 90 degrees discrepancy was found in 9/60 cases (15%) and 12/60 cases (20%), respectively (P < .02 for comparison of TUS and TVS). In 5 cases, the digital examination erroneously perceived an occiput posterior position as occiput anterior. No significant differences in fetal head position were detected between TUS and TVS, when the examination was technically feasible. The mean time (+/-SD) required for determining fetal head position was shortest for TVS (8.7 +/- 5.8 seconds) in comparison to DVE (22.7 +/- 14.6 seconds; P < .0001) or TAS (31.7 +/- 19.1 seconds; P < .0001).
Conclusion: Transvaginal sonography was the most successful and accurate method for determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor, and required the least time for performance. We believe that TVS should be routinely performed in the labor room setting for the determination of fetal head position.
Similar articles
-
Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11896948
-
Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11896947
-
Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Dec 1;123(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009. Epub 2005 May 31. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005. PMID: 15925438 Clinical Trial.
-
Sonographic evaluation of the fetal head position and attitude during labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S890-S900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.003. Epub 2023 May 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37278991 Review.
-
Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Mar;27(5):520-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.825598. Epub 2013 Sep 13. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014. PMID: 23865738 Review.
Cited by
-
Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of fetal spine position.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:783598. doi: 10.1155/2014/783598. Epub 2014 Aug 4. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 25157368 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;80(1):26-37. doi: 10.1159/000370001. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015. PMID: 25634647 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum Ultrasound Guidance to Make Safer Any Obstetric Intervention: Fetal Head Rotation, Assisted Vaginal Birth, Breech Delivery of the Second Twin.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 1;67(4):730-738. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000891. Epub 2024 Oct 18. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39431493 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound. 2016 Nov;24(4):222-232. doi: 10.1177/1742271X16673124. Epub 2016 Oct 6. Ultrasound. 2016. PMID: 27847537 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maternal postures for fetal malposition in labour for improving the health of mothers and their infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 31;8(8):CD014615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014615. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36043437 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous