Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial
- PMID: 16099700
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.003
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effect of tigecycline monotherapy, a first-in-class, expanded broad spectrum glycylcycline, with the combination of vancomycin and aztreonam (V + A) in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI).
Methods: A phase 3, double-blind study conducted in 8 countries enrolled adults with cSSSI who required intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for > or =5 days. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tigecycline or V + A for up to 14 days. Primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic efficacy and in vitro susceptibility to tigecycline of bacteria that cause cSSSI. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory analyses, and adverse event reporting.
Results: A total of 596 patients were screened for enrollment, 573 were analyzed for safety, 537 were included in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) population, 397 were clinically evaluable (CE), and 228 were microbiologically evaluable (ME). At test-of-cure, cure rates were similar between tigecycline and V + A groups in the CE population (82.9% versus 82.3%, respectively) and in the c-mITT population (75.5% versus 76.9%, respectively). Microbiologic eradication rates (subject level) at test-of-cure in the ME population were also similar between tigecycline and V + A. Frequency of adverse events was similar between groups, although patients receiving tigecycline had higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and anorexia, while increased ALT/SGPT, pruritus, and rash occurred significantly more often in V + A-treated patients.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the efficacy of tigecycline monotherapy for the treatment of patients with cSSSI is statistically noninferior to the combination of V + A.
Similar articles
-
The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam.Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;41 Suppl 5:S341-53. doi: 10.1086/431675. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16080072 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline compared with vancomycin or linezolid for treatment of serious infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Sep;62 Suppl 1:i17-28. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn250. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008. PMID: 18684703 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin-aztreonam in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections in patients from India and Taiwan.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011 Apr;44(2):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2010.04.002. Epub 2011 Jan 15. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011. PMID: 21439514 Clinical Trial.
-
Therapeutic applications of tigecycline in the management of complicated skin and skin structure infections.Int J Infect Dis. 2007 May;11 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1016/S1201-9712(07)60002-2. Int J Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17603950 Review.
-
Tigecycline: a review of a new glycylcycline antibiotic.J Dermatolog Treat. 2005;16(4):207-12. doi: 10.1080/09546630510011810. J Dermatolog Treat. 2005. PMID: 16249141 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 21;10:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-217. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20663130 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Busting the Myth of "Static vs Cidal": A Systemic Literature Review.Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 17;66(9):1470-1474. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1127. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29293890 Free PMC article.
-
Tigecycline in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and complicated skin and skin structure infections.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Dec;3(6):1059-70. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007. PMID: 18516315 Free PMC article.
-
Insufficient Representation of Patients With Obesity in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobials for Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Scoping Review.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 20;10(3):ofad144. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad144. eCollection 2023 Mar. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36998628 Free PMC article.
-
Tigecycline: an evidence-based review of its antibacterial activity and effectiveness in complicated skin and soft tissue and intraabdominal infections.Core Evid. 2006;1(3):181-94. Epub 2006 Mar 31. Core Evid. 2006. PMID: 22500153 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical