Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section
- PMID: 16100622
- DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30545-x
Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of prenatal sonography in determining the lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in women with previous Caesarean section and to assess the usefulness of measuring LUS thickness in predicting the risk of uterine rupture during a trial of vaginal birth.
Methods: Sonographic examination was performed in 102 pregnant women with one or more previous Caesarean sections at between 36 and 38 weeks' gestation to assess the LUS thickness, which was defined as the shortest distance between the urinary bladder wall-myometrium interface and the myometrium/chorioamniotic membrane-amniotic fluid interface. Of the 102 women examined, 91 (89.2%) had transabdominal sonography only, and 11 (10.8%) had both transabdominal and transvaginal examinations. The sonographic measurements were correlated with the delivery outcome and the intraoperative LUS appearance.
Results: The mean sonographic LUS thickness was 1.8 mm, standard deviation (SD) 1.1 mm. An intraoperatively diagnosed paper-thin or dehisced LUS, when compared with an LUS of normal thickness, had a significantly smaller sonographic LUS measurement (0.9 mm, SD 0.5 mm, vs. 2.0 mm, SD 0.8 mm, respectively; P < 0.0001). Two women had uterine dehiscence, both of whom had prenatal LUS thickness of < 1 mm. Thirty-two women (31.4%) had a successful vaginal delivery, with a mean LUS thickness of 1.9 mm, SD 1.5 mm; none had clinical uterine rupture. A sonographic LUS thickness of 1.5 mm had a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 59.5%, a positive predictive value of 32.0%, and a negative predictive value of 96.2% in predicting a paper-thin or dehisced LUS.
Conclusions: Sonography permits accurate assessment of the LUS thickness in women with previous Caesarean section and therefore can potentially be used to predict the risk of uterine rupture during trial of vaginal birth.
Similar articles
-
[Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 25;54(6):375-380. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.06.004. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31262121 Chinese.
-
Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery.J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Nov;23(11):1441-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.11.1441. J Ultrasound Med. 2004. PMID: 15498908
-
Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):609-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3687-0. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 25814295
-
Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):132-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12479. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23576473 Review.
-
Predicting Uterine Rupture Risk Using Lower Uterine Segment Measurement During Pregnancy With Cesarean History: How Reliable Is It? A Review.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2023 May;78(5):302-308. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001143. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2023. PMID: 37263964 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of uterine dehiscence via machine learning by using lower uterine segment thickness and clinical features.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Aug 16;2(4):100085. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100085. eCollection 2022 Nov. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36536838 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: A STARD-compliant article.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21448. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021448. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32756164 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in parturients with previous scar in labor: a cross-sectional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 14;22(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04747-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35568830 Free PMC article.
-
Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: ESUR recommendations.Eur Radiol. 2013 Dec;23(12):3485-500. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2987-7. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23990045
-
Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging.Radiol Med. 2015 Feb;120(2):228-38. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0431-y. Epub 2014 Aug 7. Radiol Med. 2015. PMID: 25100304
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources