Similar articles

• Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Harv Law Rev. 2005 Jun;118(8):2792-813. Harv Law Rev. 2005. PMID: 15988862 No abstract available.
• Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision.

  Stark B. Stark B. Harv Womens Law J. 1988 Spring;11:19-52. Harv Womens Law J. 1988. PMID: 16100827 No abstract available.
• The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.

  O'Shaughnessy M. O'Shaughnessy M. Ohio State Law J. 1996;57(5):1731-65. Ohio State Law J. 1996. PMID: 16086519 No abstract available.
• Reducing reproductive rights:spousal consent for abortion and sterilisation.

  Rajalakshmi. Rajalakshmi. Indian J Med Ethics. 2007 Jul-Sep;4(3):102-3. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2007.041. Indian J Med Ethics. 2007. PMID: 18624133 Review. No abstract available.
• Legal principles and essential surrogacy cases every practitioner should know.

  Crockin SL, Edmonds MA, Altman A. Crockin SL, et al. Fertil Steril. 2020 May;113(5):908-915. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Apr 20. Fertil Steril. 2020. PMID: 32327239 Review.