Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients
- PMID: 16102671
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.08.004
Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients
Abstract
This study surveys voice therapists regarding common diagnostic practices in patients referred for therapy with the diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia (broadly defined as the "hyperfunctional" component of the dysphonia). Through postings on the e-mail list of the ASHA special interest division on voice, speech pathologists with at least 3 years' experience in stroboscopy and acoustic instrumentation were invited to complete the survey. Results from 53 completed surveys demonstrated that voice quality and patient self-perception are the sole assessments performed by all therapists. Voice quality, observation of body posture and movement, and probing the patient's ability to alter voice production are each significantly more likely to be performed than the more objective stroboscopic, acoustic, aerodynamic, and EGG assessments. Further, the tasks of defining specific therapy session goals and helping the patient to achieve a particular target skill are considered best served by measures of vocal quality, observation of body position and movement, and judging the patient's ability to alter voice production. For definition of the overall therapy goal, stroboscopy and patient perception scales are added to all of the subjective assessment measures as being important. Acoustic data are considered most important for patient reinforcement and outcomes assessment. Implications of these findings are discussed, and topics for further exploration are identified.
Similar articles
-
Outcome of laryngeal manual therapy in four Dutch adults with persistent moderate-to-severe vocal hyperfunction: a pilot study.J Voice. 2004 Dec;18(4):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.003. J Voice. 2004. PMID: 15567048
-
How we do it: adjunctive intravenous midazolam: diagnosis and treatment of therapy-resistant muscle tension dysphonia.Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Aug;30(4):367-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.00976.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 16209683
-
Voice therapy for vocal fold paralysis.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004 Feb;37(1):105-19. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(03)00163-4. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15062689 Review.
-
Muscle tension dysphonia in children: Voice characteristics and outcome of voice therapy.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Jul;69(7):911-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.01.030. Epub 2005 Mar 16. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 15911008
-
Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review.J Voice. 2005 Jun;19(2):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.03.007. J Voice. 2005. PMID: 15907440 Review.
Cited by
-
A Measure of the Auditory-perceptual Quality of Strain from Electroglottographic Analysis of Continuous Dysphonic Speech: Application to Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):770.e9-770.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 28. J Voice. 2016. PMID: 26739857 Free PMC article.
-
Posturographic analysis in patients with dysfunctional dysphonia before and after speech therapy/rehabilitation treatment.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012 Apr;32(2):115-21. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012. PMID: 22767973 Free PMC article.
-
Rater methodology for stroboscopy: a systematic review.J Voice. 2015 Jan;29(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Sep 26. J Voice. 2015. PMID: 25261957 Free PMC article.
-
Videokymographic index of glottic function: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Codas. 2022 Oct 17;35(1):e20210214. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021214pt. eCollection 2022. Codas. 2022. PMID: 36259820 Free PMC article.
-
The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: an analysis of singers with dysphonia and without vocal complaints.Codas. 2022 Jul 25;34(6):e20210095. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021095pt. eCollection 2022. Codas. 2022. PMID: 35894307 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical