Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;79(17):10968-77.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.10968-10977.2005.

Hepatitis A virus suppresses RIG-I-mediated IRF-3 activation to block induction of beta interferon

Affiliations

Hepatitis A virus suppresses RIG-I-mediated IRF-3 activation to block induction of beta interferon

Volker Fensterl et al. J Virol. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) antagonizes the innate immune response by inhibition of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-induced beta interferon (IFN-beta) gene expression. In this report, we show that this is due to an interaction of HAV with the intracellular dsRNA-induced retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-mediated signaling pathway upstream of the kinases responsible for interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) phosphorylation (TBK1 and IKKepsilon). In consequence, IRF-3 is not activated for nuclear translocation and gene induction. In addition, we found that HAV reduces TRIF (TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-beta)-mediated IRF-3 activation, which is part of the Toll-like receptor 3 signaling pathway. As IRF-3 is necessary for IFN-beta transcription, inhibition of this factor results in efficient suppression of IFN-beta synthesis. This ability of HAV seems to be of considerable importance for HAV replication, as HAV is not resistant to IFN-beta, and it may allow the virus to establish infection and preserve the sites of virus production in later stages of the infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
HAV inhibits dsRNA-induced activation of IRF-3 but not of NF-κB. FRhK-4 cells stably transfected with PRDII-CAT (A) or PRDIII-I-CAT (B) reporter plasmids were infected with HAV/7 at an MOI of 1 and transfected with poly(I-C) by DEAE-dextran (DD) 9 days postinfection; 16 h later, cell extracts were analyzed for NF-κB-dependent (A) or IRF-3-dependent (B) CAT expression. Noninfectedcells and cells treated with medium or DEAE-dextran alone were used as controls. Data represent means of two replicates, and experiments were carried out twice. (C) Nuclear translocation of NF-κB was examined by immunofluorescence. MRC-5 cells infected with HAV-GBM were transfected with poly(I-C) by DEAE-dextran (DD); after 3 h, cells were fixed and permeabilized with 4% paraformaldehyde/methanol, and immunostained for NF-κB p65 (fluorescein isothiocyanate) and HAV (Texas Red). Nontransfected and/or noninfected cells were used as controls. Results are representative of two independent experiments. Magnification, ×400 (Axioskop II, Zeiss).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
HAV inhibits IRF-3 nuclear translocation and phosphorylation. (A to D) FRhK-4/GFP-IRF-3 cells infected with HAV/7 were infected with NDV (MOI, 10); 4 h postinfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% Triton X-100 and immunostained for HAV (Texas Red) (D). Noninfected cells (A) and cells infected only with HAV or NDV (B and C) were used as controls. Magnification, ×400 (Axioskop II, Zeiss). (E) IRF-3 C-terminal phosphorylation was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. FRhK-4/IRF-3 cells noninfected or infected with HAV/7 were inoculated with NDV at an MOI of 10 for 2 h. At different times postinfection, whole-cell extracts were prepared. Phosphorylated IRF-3 was detected as an additional, slower-migrating form. All results shown are representative of a series of three independent experiments.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
NDV replication kinetics under one-step growth conditions in FRhK-4 cells infected or not infected with HAV/7. The kinetics show the total NDV titers in the course of 24 h. Titers were determined in FRhK-4 cells by cytopathic effect 6 days after inoculation. Each data point is an average obtained from duplicate titrations of two separate experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations of the mean. HAV infection of 100% of the cells was proved by indirect immunofluorescence prior to infection with NDV (MOI of 10) (lower half).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
HAV does not inhibit IFN-β induction and IRF-3 activation by IKKɛ or TBK1. (A) In order to analyze IKKɛ-dependent IFN-β induction (IFN-β-CAT) or IRF-3 activity (PRDIII-I-CAT), noninfected or HAV/7-infected FRhK-4 cells were cotransfected with CAT reporter gene plasmids and an IKKɛ expression vector. NDV infection (MOI of 0.1) was used as a control for functional HAV infection in cells cotransfected with the empty vector. (B) For analysis of TBK1-dependent IFN-β induction (IFN-β-Luc) or IRF-3 activity (PRDIII-I-Luc), noninfected or HAV/7-infected FRhK-4 cells were cotransfected with luciferase reporter gene plasmids and a TBK1 expression vector. NDV infection (MOI of 0.1) was used as a control for functional HAV infection in cells cotransfected with the empty vector. The right panel includes TBK1-transfected plus NDV-infected controls to demonstrate the integrity of the inhibitory mechanism of HAV independently of TBK1 overexpression. In all experiments, NDV infection was performed 24 h after transfection, and reporter gene expression was analyzed 42 h after transfection. Data represent means of at least two replicates, and experiments were carried out at least twice.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
HAV inhibits IFN-β induction and IRF-3 activation by RIG-I. In order to analyze RIG-I-dependent IFN-β induction (IFN-β-CAT) (A) or IRF-3 activity (PRDIII-I-CAT) (B), noninfected or HAV/7-infected FRhK-4 cells were cotransfected with CAT reporter gene plasmids and a RIG-I expression vector (upper panels). Empty vector cotransfection was used as a control. CAT expression was analyzed 42 h after transfection. Flag-RIG-I overexpression was verified by immunoblotting (lower panels). Data represent means of at least two replicates, and experiments were carried out at least twice.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
RIG-I N-terminal deletion mutant (RIG-IC) suppresses IFN-β enhancer activation induced by poly(I-C) transfection or NDV infection. FRhK-4 cells were cotransfected with IFN-β-CAT and a RIG-IC expression vector encoding the RIG-I dsRNA-binding helicase domain; 24 h later, cells were transfected with poly(I-C) via DEAE-dextran (DD) (A) or infected with NDV (MOI of 0.1) (B) and 18 h later, cell extracts were analyzed for CAT expression. Data represent means of two replicates, and experiments were carried out twice.
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
HAV negatively affects IFN-β induction and IRF-3 activation by TRIF. TRIF-dependent IFN-β induction (IFN-β-CAT) (A) or IRF-3 activity (PRDIII-I-CAT) (B) was examined in noninfected or HAV/7-infected FRhK-4 cells after cotransfection with CAT reporter gene plasmids and a TRIF expression vector. Empty vector cotransfection was used as a control. CAT expression was analyzed 42 h after transfection. Data represent means of at least two replicates, and experiments were carried out at least twice.
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.
Model of HAV interaction with the dsRNA-induced IRF-3 activation pathway. Intracellular dsRNA binds to RIG-I, which regulates downstream activation of IKKɛ or TBK1, which form a complex with adapters, such as TANK (9), by still unknown intermediate components. Activated IKKɛ/TBK1 then phosphorylate IRF-3, leading to its dimerization, nuclear translocation, and transactivity. Extracellular dsRNA binds to TLR3 associated with intracellular vesicles, inducing recruitment of TBK1 and IRF-3 via its adapter TRIF, resulting in IRF-3 phosphorylation and activation. Hepatitis A virus suppresses intracellular dsRNA-induced RIG-I-mediated IRF-3 phosphorylation by a mechanism acting upstream of IKKɛ/TBK1. Additionally, HAV negatively affects TRIF-induced IRF-3 activation, probably inhibiting TLR3 signaling as well.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akira, S., and K. Takeda. 2004. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:499-511. - PubMed
    1. Alexopoulou, L., A. C. Holt, R. Medzhitov, and R. A. Flavell. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413:732-738. - PubMed
    1. Andrejeva, J., K. S. Childs, D. F. Young, T. S. Carlos, N. Stock, S. Goodbourn, and R. E. Randall. 2004. The V proteins of paramyxoviruses bind the IFN-inducible RNA helicase, mda-5, and inhibit its activation of the IFN-β promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:17264-17269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balachandran, S., E. Thomas, and G. N. Barber. 2004. A FADD-dependent innate immune mechanism in mammalian cells. Nature 432:401-405. - PubMed
    1. Barro, M., and J. T. Patton. 2005. Rotavirus nonstructural protein 1 subverts innate immune response by inducing degradation of IFN regulatory factor 3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:4114-4119. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances