Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era
- PMID: 16103238
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.528455
Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era
Abstract
Background: Most studies that are the basis of recommended volume thresholds for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) predate the routine use of stent placement.
Methods and results: Data from New York's Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Reporting System in 1998 to 2000 (n=107 713) were used to examine the impact of annual hospital volume and annual operator volume on in-hospital mortality, same-day coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and same-stay CABG surgery after adjustment for differences in patients' severity of illness. For a hospital-volume threshold of 400, the odds ratios for low-volume hospitals versus high-volume hospitals were 1.98 (95% CI, 1.17, 3.35) for in-hospital mortality, 2.07 (95% CI, 1.36, 3.15) for same-day CABG surgery, and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.03, 2.21) for same-stay CABG surgery. For an operator-volume threshold of 75, the odds ratios for low-volume versus high-volume operators were 1.65 (95% CI, 1.05, 2.60) for same-day CABG surgery and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.10, 2.18) for same-stay CABG surgery. Operator volume was not significantly associated with mortality. Also, for hospital volumes below 400 and operator volumes below 75, the respective odds of mortality, same-day CABG surgery, and same-stay CABG surgery were 5.92, 4.02, and 3.92 times the odds for hospital volumes of 400 or higher and operator volumes of 75 or higher.
Conclusions: Higher-volume operators and hospitals continue to experience lower risk-adjusted PCI outcome rates.
Comment in
-
Measuring percutaneous coronary intervention quality by simple case volume.Circulation. 2005 Aug 23;112(8):1088-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.561126. Circulation. 2005. PMID: 16116067 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
