Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Aug;7(8):464-70.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04535.x.

Treating stage 2 hypertension

Affiliations
Review

Treating stage 2 hypertension

Thomas D Giles et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2005 Aug.

Abstract

The prevalence of hypertension increases with advancing age, due primarily to increases in systolic blood pressure. Systolic hypertension is the most common form of hypertension in individuals over 50 years of age and reflects pathologic decreases in arterial compliance. Systolic blood pressure elevation is a more important risk factor for cardiovascular disease than is diastolic blood pressure elevation. Stage 2 hypertension, defined as blood pressure > or =160/100 mm Hg, is often found in older persons, who are at highest risk for cardiovascular events. In this clinical review, hypertension experts utilize a case study to provide a paradigm for treating older patients with stage 2 hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Algorithm for the treatment of hypertension. SBP=systolic blood pressure; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; ACEl=angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB=angiotensin receptor blocker; βB=β blocker; CCB=calcium channel blocker. Reproduced with permission from Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252.4
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reductions in 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the intent‐to‐treat population in a comparison of a fixed‐dose combination (amlodipine besylate—benazepril HCl) with either of its two components. δ=change; *p<0.0001 for combination vs. both other treatments

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fields LE, Burt VL, Cutler JA, et al. The burden of adult hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: a rising tide. Hypertension. 2004; 44:398–404. - PubMed
    1. Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Hypertension. 1995; 25:305–313. - PubMed
    1. Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA, et al. Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2001; 103:1245–1249. - PubMed
    1. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003; 42:1206–1252. - PubMed
    1. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA. 2003; 290:199–206. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances