Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug 22;93(4):392-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602701.

Mortality following development of breast cancer while using oestrogen or oestrogen plus progestin: a computer record-linkage study

Affiliations

Mortality following development of breast cancer while using oestrogen or oestrogen plus progestin: a computer record-linkage study

W Chen et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

The literature on the relationship between breast cancer mortality and postmenopausal oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestin therapy is seemingly contradictory. This study explored survival after exposure to oestrogen or oestrogen plus progestin at or in the year prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Information on patients first diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1993 and 1998 was linked with outpatient pharmacy data from 1992 to 2000. Patients were classified according to use of oestrogen alone or oestrogen plus progestin at or in the year prior to diagnosis. Compared to nonusers, and adjusting for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, tumour size and grade, oestrogen receptor status, surgery status, and chemotherapy and hormone therapy for breast cancer treatment, oestrogen plus progestin users had lower all-cause mortality (stage I hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.48-0.99; stage II HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.39-0.72) and breast cancer mortality (stage I HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.26-1.04; stage II HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98). Oestrogen users experienced little or no survival benefit for all-cause mortality (stage I HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.77-1.42; stage II HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65-1.14) or breast cancer mortality (stage I HR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.10; stage II HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.72-1.41). Our findings suggest, relative to nonusers, a lower risk of death from all causes and from breast cancer in patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer while exposed to oestrogen plus progestin, but not in patients exposed to oestrogen only.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of study subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted survival curves by hormone exposure status. Y-axis label, survival function estimate. X-axis label, months after breast cancer diagnosis. All survival curves were adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, tumour size and grade, oestrogen receptor status, surgery status, and chemotherapy and hormone therapy for breast cancer treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antonie C, Liebens F, Carly B, Pastijn A, Rozenbarg S (2004) Influence of HRT on prognostic factors for breast cancer: a systematic review after the Women's Health Initiative trial. Hum Reprod 19: 741–756 - PubMed
    1. Barrett-Connor E (1991) Postmenopausal estrogen and prevention bias. Ann Intern Med 115: 455–456 - PubMed
    1. Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362: 419–427 - PubMed
    1. Bergkvist L, Adami HO, Persson I, Bergstrom R, Krusemo UB (1989) Prognosis after breast cancer diagnosis in women exposed to estrogen and estrogen–progestogen replacement therapy. Am J Epidemiol 130: 221–228 - PubMed
    1. Bundred NJ, Morris J (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy: the Million Women Study. Lancet 362: 1329. - PubMed