Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005;32(2):147-50.

Interruption of aortic arch in adults: surgical experience with extra-anatomic bypass

Affiliations

Interruption of aortic arch in adults: surgical experience with extra-anatomic bypass

C Sai Krishna et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005.

Abstract

We reviewed our 3-year experience in treating interruption of the aorta in adult patients. Clinical profiles, surgical management, and results of early and mid-term follow-up are presented. From August 2001 through June 2003, 7 adult patients underwent an extra-anatomic bypass procedure to repair interruption of the aortic arch. Five patients underwent ventral aortic repair through a mid-sternotomy and an upper midline laparotomy, and 2 patients underwent repair through a left posterolateral thoracotomy. A bovine collagen-impregnated polyester fiber graft was used in 6 patients, and a Gore-Tex graft was interposed in 1 patient. All repairs were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Follow-up was complete in all patients. The mean follow-up was 1728 +/- 1 months (range, 9-31 months). No neurologic, renal, or gastrointestinal complications were noted in any patient. There was no in-hospital or late mortality or need for re-intervention. All patients were asymptomatic; however, 5 patients had mild residual hypertension. Graft patency in all the patients was confirmed by computed tomographic angiography. Interruption of the aorta is rare in adults. Ventral aortic repair through a midline approach is our preferred technique for surgical repair of this entity, because it avoids the extensive network of collateral vessels on the chest wall, enables simultaneous treatment of associated lesions, and in all likelihood reduces morbidity and mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1 Magnetic resonance angiogram shows type A interruption.
None
Fig. 2 Follow-up computed tomographic angiogram shows ventral aortic repair of type A interruption.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siderys H, Graffis R, Halbrook H, Kasbeckar V. A technique for management of inaccessible coarctation of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1974;67:568–70. - PubMed
    1. Wukasch DC, Cooley DA, Sandiford FM, Nappi G, Reul GJ Jr. Ascending aorta-abdominal aorta bypass: indications, technique, and report of 12 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1977;23:442–8. - PubMed
    1. Robicsek F, Hess PJ, Vajtai P. Ascending-distal abdominal aorta bypass for treatment of hypoplastic aortic arch and atypical coarctation in the adult. Ann Thorac Surg 1984; 37:261–3. - PubMed
    1. Steidele RJ. Samml Chir U Med Beob (Vienna) 1778;2: 114.
    1. Celoria GC, Patton RB. Congenital absence of the aortic arch. Am Heart J 1959;58:407–13. - PubMed