Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Sep;6(5):397-409.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-005-0043-9.

Advances in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

Affiliations
Review

Advances in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

Matthew Kulke. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by generally slow growth rates and the ability to secrete a variety of hormones and biogenic amines. For patients with localized disease, surgical resection alone is often curative; however, patients with metastatic disease often present a therapeutic challenge. Although somatostatin analogs are highly effective in controlling symptoms of hormonal secretion, they are rarely associated with tumor regression. Selected patients with hepatic metastases may benefit from surgical debulking, embolization, or other ablative therapies. The clinical benefit associated with the administration of systemic agents such as alpha interferon or cytotoxic chemotherapy is less clear, and the widespread use of such regimens has been limited by their relatively modest antitumor activity as well as by concerns regarding their potential toxicity. The highly vascular nature of neuroendocrine tumors has led to interest in angiogenesis inhibition as a potentially novel treatment strategy. In addition, several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently being evaluated in a Phase II setting. The naturally indolent growth of neuroendocrine tumors presents a challenge in interpreting efficacy endpoints from small Phase II studies. Larger, randomized trials, along with the evaluation of surrogate endpoints of biologic activity, may be necessary to establish the potential clinical benefit of these novel agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cancer. 1997 Apr 1;79(7):1294-8 - PubMed
    1. Med Hypotheses. 1980 Mar;6(3):277-96 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2002 May;43(5):610-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991 Apr;17(2):191-9 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 2003 Dec;134(6):1057-63; discussion 1063-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources