Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Sep;15(9):1258-64.
doi: 10.1101/gr.3929705. Epub 2005 Aug 18.

Origin and evolution of new exons in rodents

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Origin and evolution of new exons in rodents

Wen Wang et al. Genome Res. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Gene number difference among organisms demonstrates that new gene origination is a fundamental biological process in evolution. Exon shuffling has been universally observed in the formation of new genes. Yet to be learned are the ways new exons originate and evolve, and how often new exons appear. To address these questions, we identified 2695 newly evolved exons in the mouse and rat by comparing the expressed sequences of 12,419 orthologous genes between human and mouse, using 743,856 pig ESTs as the outgroup. The new exon origination rate is about 2.71 x 10(-3) per gene per million years. These new exons have markedly accelerated rates both of nonsynonymous substitutions and of insertions/deletions (indels). A much higher proportion of new exons have K(a)/K(s) ratios >1 (where K(a) is the nonsynonymous substitution rate and K(s) is the synonymous substitution rate) than do the old exons shared by human and mouse, implying a role of positive selection in the rapid evolution. The majority of these new exons have sequences unique in the genome, suggesting that most new exons might originate through "exonization" of intronic sequences. Most of the new exons appear to be alternative exons that are expressed at low levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic relationships of the mammalian species, indicating comparisons used to identify newly evolved exons that are found in rodents, but in neither human nor pig.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Ka (A) and Ks (B) distributions of the newly evolved I and N exons and their sister exons. The bin size for log(Ka) is 0.15, and bin size for log(Ks) is 0.1.

References

    1. Ast, G. 2004. How did alternative splicing evolve? Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 773-782. - PubMed
    1. Brosius, J. and Gould, S.J. 1992. On “genomenclature”: A comprehensive (and respectful) taxonomy for pseudogenes and other “junk DNA”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10706-10710. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domazet-Loso, T. and Tautz, D. 2003. An evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in Drosophila. Genome Res. 13: 2213-2219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert, W. 1978. Why genes in pieces? Nature 271: 44. - PubMed
    1. Gilbert, W., de Souza S.J., and Long, M. 1997. Origin of genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 7698-7703. - PMC - PubMed

WEB SITE REFERENCES

    1. ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/HomoloGene/; HomoloGene database for human-mouse orthologous genes in RefSeq format.
    1. ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/repository/UniGene/; the human and mouse mRNA/EST data.
    1. http://genome.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/10april2003/database/; human UniGene database.
    1. http://genome.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/mmFeb2003/database/; mouse UniGene database.
    1. http://genome.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/mmFeb2003/alignments/vsRn2/axtBest/; Mouse-rat genome alignment from UCSC.

Publication types