Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;22(9):617-20.
doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.013987.

Simplifying thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block

Affiliations

Simplifying thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block

A D Reuben et al. Emerg Med J. 2005 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Emerg Med J. 2005 Nov;22(11):836
  • Emerg Med J. 2006 Feb;23(2):163

Abstract

Objectives: To redesign and simplify an existing decision algorithm for the management of patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain and left bundle branch block (LBBB) based on the Sgarbossa criteria. To compare its reliability with the current algorithm.

Methods: A simplified algorithm was created and tested against the existing algorithm. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) of patients with LBBB were presented to 10 emergency department doctors with both old and new algorithms a week apart. Six ECGs displayed the relevant criteria for thrombolysis and had proven acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on a gold standard of enzyme measurements. Subjects were asked whether or not they would thrombolyse a patient presenting with the given ECG using each of the algorithms as a guide.

Results: The new algorithm has demonstrated improvements in terms of an increase in appropriate thrombolysis and a reduction in inappropriate thrombolysis. Specificity for AMI rose from 0.85 to 0.99 and sensitivity from 0.38 to 0.6. kappa score showed greater agreement with the gold standard.

Conclusion: Patients with AMI and LBBB have a significantly poorer outcome than those without LBBB. Despite this, thrombolysis is less likely to be given to patients with AMI and LBBB. This study demonstrates that in part this is because of cognitive difficulties using the current algorithm. The proposed proforma addresses these issues and provides a simple tool to aid appropriate treatment in this group of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Cardiol. 1983;2(5-6):521-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1999 Feb 24;281(8):714-9 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1998 Mar 31;97(12):1150-6 - PubMed
    1. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):561-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 May;37(5):431-8 - PubMed