Simplifying thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block
- PMID: 16113178
- PMCID: PMC1726923
- DOI: 10.1136/emj.2003.013987
Simplifying thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block
Erratum in
- Emerg Med J. 2005 Nov;22(11):836
- Emerg Med J. 2006 Feb;23(2):163
Abstract
Objectives: To redesign and simplify an existing decision algorithm for the management of patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain and left bundle branch block (LBBB) based on the Sgarbossa criteria. To compare its reliability with the current algorithm.
Methods: A simplified algorithm was created and tested against the existing algorithm. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) of patients with LBBB were presented to 10 emergency department doctors with both old and new algorithms a week apart. Six ECGs displayed the relevant criteria for thrombolysis and had proven acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on a gold standard of enzyme measurements. Subjects were asked whether or not they would thrombolyse a patient presenting with the given ECG using each of the algorithms as a guide.
Results: The new algorithm has demonstrated improvements in terms of an increase in appropriate thrombolysis and a reduction in inappropriate thrombolysis. Specificity for AMI rose from 0.85 to 0.99 and sensitivity from 0.38 to 0.6. kappa score showed greater agreement with the gold standard.
Conclusion: Patients with AMI and LBBB have a significantly poorer outcome than those without LBBB. Despite this, thrombolysis is less likely to be given to patients with AMI and LBBB. This study demonstrates that in part this is because of cognitive difficulties using the current algorithm. The proposed proforma addresses these issues and provides a simple tool to aid appropriate treatment in this group of patients.
Comment in
-
Simpler thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block.Emerg Med J. 2006 Apr;23(4):325. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.032110. Emerg Med J. 2006. PMID: 16549591 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Interobserver agreement in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):566-71. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.112077. Ann Emerg Med. 2000. PMID: 11097696
-
Can myocardial infarction be rapidly identified in emergency department patients who have left bundle-branch block?Ann Emerg Med. 2001 May;37(5):431-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114900. Ann Emerg Med. 2001. PMID: 11326177
-
Using the 12-lead ECG to diagnose acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block.Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Jan;15(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Nov 13. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17097881 Review.
-
Lack of association between left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction in symptomatic ED patients.Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):916-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.007. Am J Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19857407
-
Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in the setting of left bundle branch block: prevalence and observer variability from a large community study.Coron Artery Dis. 2003 Aug;14(5):387-93. doi: 10.1097/01.mca.0000085135.16622.e8. Coron Artery Dis. 2003. PMID: 12878904 Review.
Cited by
-
To perform thrombolysis or not: a case of acute pancreatitis presenting with chest pain and transient left bundle branch block.Case Rep Med. 2010;2010:204547. doi: 10.1155/2010/204547. Epub 2010 Sep 14. Case Rep Med. 2010. PMID: 20871856 Free PMC article.
-
Simpler thrombolysis decisions in patients with left bundle branch block.Emerg Med J. 2006 Apr;23(4):325. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.032110. Emerg Med J. 2006. PMID: 16549591 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical