Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia
- PMID: 16115962
- DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000175214.38450.91
Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia
Abstract
Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia is a common event. In the current investigation, we sought to identify the predictors of clinically significant hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia. Computerized anesthesia records of 4096 patients undergoing general anesthesia were queried for arterial blood pressure (BP), demographic information, preoperative drug history, and anesthetic induction regimen. The median BP was determined preinduction and for 0-5 and 5-10 min postinduction of anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as either: mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decrease of >40% and MAP <70 mm Hg or MAP <60 mm Hg. Overall, 9% of patients experienced severe hypotension 0-10 min postinduction of general anesthesia. Hypotension was more prevalent in the second half of the 0-10 min interval after anesthetic induction (P < 0.001). In 2406 patients with retrievable outcome data, prolonged postoperative stay and/or death was more common in patients with versus those without postinduction hypotension (13.3% and 8.6%, respectively, multivariate P < 0.02). Statistically significant multivariate predictors of hypotension 0-10 min after anesthetic induction included: ASA III-V, baseline MAP <70 mm Hg, age > or =50 yr, the use of propofol for induction of anesthesia, and increasing induction dosage of fentanyl. Smaller doses of propofol, etomidate, and thiopental were not associated with less hypotension. To avoid severe hypotension, alternatives to propofol anesthetic induction (e.g., etomidate) should be considered in patients older than 50 yr of age with ASA physical status > or =3. We conclude that it is advisable to avoid propofol induction in patients who present with baseline MAP <70 mm Hg.
Comment in
-
Anesthesia information systems: developing the physiologic phenotype database.Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):620-621. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000175215.25516.95. Anesth Analg. 2005. PMID: 16115961 No abstract available.
-
Recommendations for postinduction hypotension: are they supported by the evidence?Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1589-90; author reply 1590. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215199.33092.A5. Anesth Analg. 2006. PMID: 16632854 No abstract available.
-
What good are large databases of intraoperative data?Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):251-2. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215122.69686.B8. Anesth Analg. 2006. PMID: 16790666 No abstract available.
-
Hemodynamics with propofol: is propofol dangerous in classes III-V patients?Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):260. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215229.42669.2D. Anesth Analg. 2006. PMID: 16790678 No abstract available.
-
Heart rate variability as a promising tool to predict hypotension.Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):264. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215217.79856.AB. Anesth Analg. 2006. PMID: 16790684 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jain U, Laflamme CJA, Aggarwal A, et al. Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes and their association with myocardial infarction during coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 1997;86:576–91.
-
- Reich DL, Bodian CA, Krol M, et al. Intraoperative hemodynamic predictors of mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;89:814–22.
-
- Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Zornow MH, et al. An objective methodology for task analysis and workload assessment in anesthesia providers. Anesthesiology 1994;80:77–92.
-
- Loeb RG. A measure of intraoperative attention to monitor displays. Anesth Analg 1993;76:337–41.
-
- Hollenberg HP, Pirraglia PA, Williams-Russo P, et al. Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:545–51.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical