[Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports]
- PMID: 16117920
[Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports]
Abstract
Introduction: Selective reporting of positive outcomes is associated with bias.
Materials and methods: We conducted a cohort study of 102 protocols of randomised trials approved by the Scientific Ethics Committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg in 1994-1995 and the corresponding 122 reports.
Results: The median proportion of incompletely reported outcomes per trial was 50%. Statistically significant outcomes were more often fully reported, odds ratio 2.4. In 62% of trials, at least one primary outcome was changed.
Discussion: Outcomes in randomised trials are often reported selectively.