Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE
- PMID: 16118812
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.2136
Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE
Abstract
Controlled clinical trials often randomize subjects to two treatment groups and repeatedly evaluate them at baseline and intervals across a treatment period of fixed duration. A popular primary objective in these trials is to compare the change rates in the repeated measurements between treatment groups. Repeated measurements usually involve missing data and a serial correlation within each subject. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) method has been widely used to fit the time trend in repeated measurements because of its robustness to random missing and mispecification of the true correlation structure. In this paper, we propose a closed form sample size formula for comparing the change rates of binary repeated measurements using GEE for a two-group comparison. The sample size formula is derived incorporating missing patterns, such as independent missing and monotone missing, and correlation structures, such as AR(1) model. We also propose an algorithm to generate correlated binary data with arbitrary marginal means and a Markov dependency and use it in simulation studies.
Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.Stat Med. 2003 Apr 30;22(8):1305-15. doi: 10.1002/sim.1384. Stat Med. 2003. PMID: 12687656
-
Improving the estimation of change from baseline in a continuous outcome measure in the clinical trial setting.Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Feb;26(1):2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.08.008. Epub 2005 Jan 27. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005. PMID: 15837448
-
Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.Stat Med. 2002 Oct 30;21(20):3035-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.1241. Stat Med. 2002. PMID: 12369080
-
An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.J Biopharm Stat. 2009 Nov;19(6):1055-73. doi: 10.1080/10543400903242795. J Biopharm Stat. 2009. PMID: 20183464 Review.
-
Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):329-45. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710423. Biom J. 2008. PMID: 18537126 Review.
Cited by
-
Sample size calculation for before-after experiments with partially overlapping cohorts.Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jan;64:274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018. PMID: 26416696 Free PMC article.
-
Sample size considerations for split-mouth design.Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2543-2551. doi: 10.1177/0962280215601137. Epub 2015 Aug 24. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017. PMID: 26303156 Free PMC article.
-
Sample size requirements for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.Stat Med. 2020 Dec 10;39(28):4218-4237. doi: 10.1002/sim.8721. Epub 2020 Aug 21. Stat Med. 2020. PMID: 32823372 Free PMC article.
-
Cyber bullying prevention: intervention in Taiwan.PLoS One. 2013 May 28;8(5):e64031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064031. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23724018 Free PMC article.
-
Power and Sample Size Calculations for Generalized Estimating Equations via Local Asymptotics.Stat Sin. 2013 Jan 1;23(1):231-250. doi: 10.5705/ss.2011.081. Stat Sin. 2013. PMID: 24478568 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials