Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992 Mar-Apr;24(2):75-84.

Family planning, sexually transmitted diseases and contraceptive choice: a literature update--Part I

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1612146
Review

Family planning, sexually transmitted diseases and contraceptive choice: a literature update--Part I

W Cates Jr et al. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Couples who use contraceptives not only protect themselves against unwanted pregnancies, but also may reduce their risk of becoming infected with a sexually transmitted disease (STD). No currently available method, however, is highly effective in protecting simultaneously against pregnancy and infection. Thus, couples who place high priority on minimizing both risks may have to use two methods. The need for contraceptive methods that provide effective protection against both pregnancy and STDs has been intensified by the HIV epidemic, but progress has been slowed by the lack of integration between the STD and family planning fields. The first part of this two-part article discusses the similarities and differences between the two fields, examines the impact of STDs on contraceptive use and services, and reviews the scientific literature dealing with the effects of condoms, spermicides and barrier-and-spermicide methods on the risk of STD transmission. Part II (which will appear in the next issue) examines what is known about the effects of oral contraceptives, the IUD, tubal sterilization and abortion on reproductive tract infections. The second part also includes a discussion of the trade-offs involved in choosing a contraceptive and presents estimates of the first-year rates of unplanned pregnancy and gonorrhea infection (given an infected partner) that would occur among women using various contraceptive methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Acceptability of dual method use.
    Steiner M, Joanis C. Steiner M, et al. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 Sep-Oct;25(5):234. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993. PMID: 8262174 No abstract available.

Substances