Axial-shear interaction effects on microdamage in bovine tibial trabecular bone
- PMID: 16123025
- DOI: 10.1080/09243860500095570
Axial-shear interaction effects on microdamage in bovine tibial trabecular bone
Abstract
Because many osteoporotic fractures occur during a fall, understanding the effect of off-axis loads on initiation and propagation of microdamage in trabecular bone should provide further insight into the biomechanics of age-related fractures. Fourteen on-axis cylindrical specimens were prepared from 12 bovine tibiae. Fluorescent stains were used to label the microdamage due to a sequence of compressive and torsional damaging loads. The mean decrease in Young's modulus was over four times greater than that in the shear modulus after the compressive overload, while there was no difference between the decrease in the axial and torsional stiffnesses after the torsional overload. The total microcrack density due to compression was uniform across the radius of the cylindrical specimens, while the mean density of microcracks due to torsional overloading increased from the axis of the cylindrical specimen to the circumference. The high density of microcracks near the axis of the specimen following torsional overloading was unexpected because of the low strains. Nearly 40% of the microcracks due to torsion propagated from pre-existing microcracks caused by axial compression, indicating that existing microcracks may extend at relatively low strain if the loading mode changes. The propagating microcracks were, on average, longer than the initiating microcracks due to either compressive or torsional loading. Damage due to axial compression appears to increase the susceptibility of trabecular bone to damage propagation during subsequent torsional loads, but it has little effect on the elastic properties in shear.
Similar articles
-
Microdamage propagation in trabecular bone due to changes in loading mode.J Biomech. 2006;39(5):781-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.007. J Biomech. 2006. PMID: 16488217
-
The behaviour of microcracks in compact bone.Eur J Morphol. 2005 Feb-Apr;42(1-2):71-9. doi: 10.1080/09243860500096131. Eur J Morphol. 2005. PMID: 16123026
-
Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression.J Biomech. 2005 Apr;38(4):707-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.013. J Biomech. 2005. PMID: 15713291
-
Microdamage and bone mechanobiology.Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):359-65. Technol Health Care. 2006. PMID: 17065757 Review.
-
Mechanical strength of trabecular bone at the knee.Dan Med Bull. 1988 Aug;35(4):345-65. Dan Med Bull. 1988. PMID: 3048922 Review.
Cited by
-
Cancellous bone lamellae strongly affect microcrack propagation and apparent mechanical properties: separation of patients with osteoporotic fracture from normal controls using a 2D nonlinear finite element method (biomechanical stereology).Bone. 2008 Jun;42(6):1184-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Feb 15. Bone. 2008. PMID: 18378204 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography.J Biomech. 2007;40(15):3397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jun 22. J Biomech. 2007. PMID: 17588588 Free PMC article.
-
Shear strength and toughness of trabecular bone are more sensitive to density than damage.J Biomech. 2011 Nov 10;44(16):2747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Sep 25. J Biomech. 2011. PMID: 21945570 Free PMC article.
-
Finite element models predict the location of microdamage in cancellous bone following uniaxial loading.J Biomech. 2015 Nov 26;48(15):4142-4148. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Oct 26. J Biomech. 2015. PMID: 26522622 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.Bone. 2013 Jul;55(1):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Feb 28. Bone. 2013. PMID: 23459314 Free PMC article.