Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research
- PMID: 16123259
- DOI: 10.1177/0163278705278277
Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the basic underlying principles of structural equation modeling (SEM). SEM models have two basic elements: a measurement model and a structural model. The measurement model describes the associations between the indicators (observed measures) of the latent variables, whereas the structural model delineates the direct and indirect substantive effects among latent variables and between measured and latent variables. The application of SEM to health outcomes research is illustrated using two examples: (a) assessing the equivalence of the SF-36 and patient evaluations of care for English- and Spanish-language respondents and (b) evaluating a theoretical model of health in myocardial infarction patients. The results of SEM studies can contribute to better understanding of the validity of health outcome measures and of relationships between physiologic, clinical, and health outcome variables.
Similar articles
-
Methods of evaluation in outcomes research.Am J Manag Care. 1998 Nov;4(11):1616-25; quiz 1626-7. Am J Manag Care. 1998. PMID: 10338907
-
[The application of structural equation model approach in epidemiological research].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Apr;26(4):297-300. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005. PMID: 15941543 Chinese.
-
Spanish-language version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): preliminary validation.Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;87(6):793-800. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060313. Epub 2007 Apr 18. Phys Ther. 2007. PMID: 17442835
-
Critical evaluation of the use of research tools in evaluating quality of life for people with schizophrenia.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(1):2-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2006.00438.x. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17229269 Review.
-
Patient-reported outcome II: selecting appropriate measures for musculoskeletal care.Musculoskeletal Care. 2007 Jun;5(2):72-90. doi: 10.1002/msc.101. Musculoskeletal Care. 2007. PMID: 17542045 Review.
Cited by
-
Validation of a patient interview for assessing reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation and continuation.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:521-32. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S25635. Epub 2012 Jul 13. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012. PMID: 22879738 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between exploratory factor-analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores.Qual Life Res. 2009 Feb;18(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9423-5. Epub 2008 Nov 26. Qual Life Res. 2009. PMID: 19034689
-
The impact of demographic and perceptual variables on a young adult's decision to be covered by private health insurance.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 12;15:195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0848-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 25962725 Free PMC article.
-
Exploratory graph analysis on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) among older adults in China.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 15;13(1):19971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46854-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37968334 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring the quality of mental health services from the patient perspective in China: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the World Health Organization responsiveness performance questionnaire.Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2035503. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2035503. Glob Health Action. 2022. PMID: 35289731 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical