This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 2005 Aug 27;80(4):542; author reply 543-4.

doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000168101.91087.cb.

C2 versus C0 cyclosporine monitoring: still not the end

Eliane M Billaud

PMID: 16123736
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000168101.91087.cb

Review

C2 versus C0 cyclosporine monitoring: still not the end

Eliane M Billaud. Transplantation. 2005.

. 2005 Aug 27;80(4):542; author reply 543-4.

doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000168101.91087.cb.

Author

Eliane M Billaud

PMID: 16123736
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000168101.91087.cb

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Comparison between C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo renal transplant recipients: retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.
Bîrsan T, Loinig C, Bodingbauer M, Wekerle T, Rockenschaub S, Berlakovich G, Soliman T, Mühlbacher F, Steininger R. Bîrsan T, et al. Transplantation. 2004 Dec 27;78(12):1787-91. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000146255.30770.76. Transplantation. 2004. PMID: 15614152

Publication types

Actions
Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wolters Kluwer
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal