Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;27(4):314-24.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20187.

Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling

Affiliations

Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling

E Luders et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Using magnetic resonance imaging and well-validated computational cortical pattern matching methods in a large and well-matched sample of healthy subjects (n = 60), we analyzed the regional specificity of gender-related cortical thickness differences across the lateral and medial cortices at submillimeter resolution. To establish the influences of brain size correction on gender effects, comparisons were performed with and without applying affine transformations to scale each image volume to a template. We revealed significantly greater cortical thickness in women compared to men, after correcting for individual differences in brain size, while no significant regional thickness increases were observed in males. The pattern and direction of the results were similar without brain size correction, although effects were less pronounced and a small cortical region in the lateral temporal lobes showed greater thickness in males. Our gender-specific findings support a dimorphic organization in male and female brains that appears to involve the architecture of the cortical mantle and that manifests as increased thickness in female brains. This sexual dimorphism favoring women, even without correcting for brain size, may have functional significance and possibly account for gender-specific abilities and/or behavioral differences between sexes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of image preprocessing steps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average cortical thickness mapped for the whole sample (n = 60) in ICBM‐305 space after using 12‐parameter transformations (left) and after using 6‐parameter transformations (right). The brain surface is color‐coded according to the color bar, where thickness is shown in millimeters. Callosal, subcallosal, and midbrain regions have been excluded on the medial aspect of the surface.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Uncorrected statistical maps of gender differences in cortical thickness in ICBM‐305 space after using 12‐parameter transformations (left) and after using 6‐parameter transformations (right). The color bar encodes the P‐value associated with the t‐tests of cortical thickness performed at each cortical surface point. All colored cortical regions indicate statistically significant differences. All gray‐shaded regions are not significantly different between males and females.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2000): Voxel‐based morphometry. The methods. Neuroimage 11: 805–821. - PubMed
    1. Barta P, Dazzan P (2003): Hemispheric surface area: sex, laterality and age effects. Cereb Cortex 13: 364–370. - PubMed
    1. Blanton RE, Levitt JG, Thompson PM, Narr KL, Capetillo‐Cunliffe L, Nobel A, Singerman JD, McCracken JT, Toga AW (2001): Mapping cortical asymmetry and complexity patterns in normal children. Psychiatry Res 107: 29–43. - PubMed
    1. Chance SA, Tzotzoli PM, Vitelli A, Esiri MM, Crow TJ (2004): The cytoarchitecture of sulcal folding in Heschl's sulcus and the temporal cortex in the normal brain and schizophrenia: lamina thickness and cell density. Neurosci Lett 367: 384–388. - PubMed
    1. Chung MK, Robbins SM, Dalton KM, Davidson RJ, Alexander AL, Evans AC (2005): Cortical thickness analysis in autism with heat kernel smoothing. Neuroimage. 25: 1256–1265. - PubMed

Publication types