Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience
- PMID: 16128974
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x
Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience
Abstract
Background: Patient choice cesarean refers to elective primary cesarean in the absence of a medical or obstetrical indication. The purpose of this study was to determine obstetricians' attitudes and practices with respect to patient choice cesarean in Maine, United States.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all Maine Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists actively practicing obstetrics, after receiving institutional review exemption. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, or chi-square tests.
Results: Seventy-eight of 110 (70.9%) obstetricians responded. Of these, 60 of 71 (84.5%) respondents performed or were willing to perform patient choice cesarean. However, 15 of 71 (21.1%) preferred a cesarean delivery for themselves (women) or partners (men). Indications included urinary continence (53.3%), adverse previous birth experience (41.7%), anal continence (35.0%), concern for fetal death or injury (33.3%), and fear of childbirth, preservation of sexual function, or pelvic organ prolapse (26.7% each). Less frequent were pain (11.7%), convenience (8.3%), and provider availability (10.0%). In addition, 82.1 percent believed medical evidence and 85.9 percent believed ethical issues sometimes or always supported patient choice cesarean. Responses were similar by gender, age, and time interval from training completion with two exceptions. Women under age 35 years were more likely to opt for a cesarean delivery themselves (p = 0.04), and 42.9 percent of respondents under age 35 years interpreted the medical literature as supporting cesarean in all cases versus 4.2 percent of older colleagues (p = 0.008). Sixty-four of 78 (82.1%) respondents would find a randomized trial of planned vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery helpful in addressing the issue of patient choice cesarean.
Conclusions: Although Maine obstetricians were willing to perform patient choice cesarean, few preferred this delivery mode for themselves or their partners. A randomized trial of planned vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery is highly desired.
Comment in
-
Obstetrician's fear of childbirth: how did it happen?Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):207-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00371.x. Birth. 2005. PMID: 16128975 No abstract available.
-
Patient choice cesarean and informed consent.Birth. 2006 Mar;33(1):87-8; author reply 88. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00081c.x. Birth. 2006. PMID: 16499540 No abstract available.
-
Risks of patient choice cesarean.Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):167-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.0098b.x. Birth. 2006. PMID: 16732786 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;284(3):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1682-z. Epub 2010 Sep 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011. PMID: 20872227
-
Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00224.x. Birth. 2008. PMID: 18507582
-
Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery.Birth. 2004 Dec;31(4):280-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00320.x. Birth. 2004. PMID: 15566340
-
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009. Semin Perinatol. 2006. PMID: 17011400 Review.
-
Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):387-92. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000107288.44622.2a. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14754712 Review.
Cited by
-
Fecal incontinence and associated pelvic floor dysfunction during and one year after the first pregnancy.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Aug;102(8):1034-1044. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14614. Epub 2023 Jun 20. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 37338103 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy-specific anxiety and elective cesarean section in primiparas: A cohort study in China.PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216870. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31091276 Free PMC article.
-
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16(3):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0769-x. Matern Child Health J. 2012. PMID: 21400201
-
The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III: a multi-site cohort study of the impact of delivery method on health, service use, and costs of care in the first postpartum year.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Apr 28;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-16. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009. PMID: 19397827 Free PMC article.
-
Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):249-268. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0. Health Care Anal. 2019. PMID: 31037420 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical