Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2005 Sep;19(9):1211-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8256-8. Epub 2005 Jul 7.

Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user's level of experience

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user's level of experience

D V Avgerinos et al. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The recent focus on quality of care and patient safety has been accompanied by increased interest in standardizing the training for laparoscopic surgeons. Studies have shown that laparoscopic simulators can be used to train surgical skills. Therefore, we designed an experiment to compare the effectiveness of two popular training systems. One system was based on a physical model, whereas the other used a virtual reality model.

Methods: A total of 32 medical students and residents were tested on both simulators. Time required for task completion and number of errors committed were recorded and compared.

Results: The physical training system differentiated among experience levels on three of the five tasks when time was used as a measure and four of five tasks when score was used, whereas the virtual reality system yielded statistically significant results in eight of 13 tasks for time and in five of 13 tasks for score.

Conclusion: The physical model is more sensitive than the virtual reality one in detecting differences in levels of laparoscopic surgical experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):126-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1998 Jun;175(6):482-7 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):466-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources