[Endosonographic imaging of tumor thickness in oral squamous cell cancer and its effect on the incidence of lymph node metastases]
- PMID: 16133281
- DOI: 10.1007/s10006-005-0630-8
[Endosonographic imaging of tumor thickness in oral squamous cell cancer and its effect on the incidence of lymph node metastases]
Abstract
Background: The correlation between increasing tumor thickness and lymph node metastases as well as reduced survival in oral cancer has been proven by several studies. In most investigations the tumor thickness was assessed in histological sections. The aim of our prospective study was to assess tumor thickness in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by intraoral ultrasonography and to evaluate the predictive value of tumor thickness for incidence of cervical lymph node involvement and survival.
Patients and methods: A total of 64 patients with primary carcinomas of the oral cavity (stage I-IV) were included. Endosonographic assessment of patients was carried out using a 7.5-mHz probe (Hitachi EUP F334). The primary tumor could be visualized in all cases as a hypoechoic, sometimes irregular mass.
Results: The average tumor thickness in all tumors was 14+/-7 mm. The N+ patients showed a greater tumor thickness (15+/-7 mm) than N0 OSCCs with 12+/-6 mm (p =0.032, t -test). Less advanced T1/T2 carcinomas revealed a tumor thickness of 10+/-5 mm in contrast to T3/T4 carcinomas with 16+/-7 mm (p <0.001, t-test). The overall survival was reduced in patients with tumors thicker than 14 mm (48.9 versus 28.3 months, p =0,0102 log rank test).
Conclusion: Although this technique facilitates the accurate assessment of tumor thickness in OSCC, only in less advanced tumors could endosonography provide additional information, since these tumors were not visible on CT or MRT scans. Nonetheless endosonography is a fast, cost-effective, and reliable technique for assessment of tumor extent in oral cancer.
Similar articles
-
The usefulness of intraoral ultrasonography in the evaluation of oral cancer.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Apr;30(2):139-43. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0035. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11405449
-
[Comparison of urokinase type plasminogen activators (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI-1) in primary resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma].Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 May;8(3):180-90. doi: 10.1007/s10006-003-0519-3. Epub 2004 Feb 6. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004. PMID: 15138856 German.
-
Management of contralateral N0 neck in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Head Neck. 2006 Oct;28(10):896-901. doi: 10.1002/hed.20423. Head Neck. 2006. PMID: 16721743
-
Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature.Head Neck. 2005 Dec;27(12):1080-91. doi: 10.1002/hed.20275. Head Neck. 2005. PMID: 16240329 Review.
-
Intraoral ultrasonography to measure tumor thickness of oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral Oncol. 2018 Feb;77:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 18. Oral Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29362123
Cited by
-
Tumour thickness in oral cancer using an intra-oral ultrasound probe.Eur Radiol. 2011 Jan;21(1):98-106. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1891-7. Epub 2010 Aug 3. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20680291 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of podoplanin expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: clinical and histopathologic correlations.Virchows Arch. 2010 May;456(5):473-82. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-0915-7. Virchows Arch. 2010. PMID: 20393745
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical