Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep 5;93(5):590-6.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602683.

Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits

Affiliations

Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits

A Berrington de González et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Mammographic screening before age 50 years is less effective than at older ages and the associated radiation risks are higher. We estimated how many breast cancer deaths could be caused and how many could be prevented by a decade of annual two-view mammographic screening starting at ages 20, 30 and 40 years, respectively, in the UK; for all women, and for women with first-degree relatives affected with breast cancer. We extrapolated from a radiation risk model to estimate the number of radiation-induced breast cancer deaths, and used results from randomised trials, which suggest a reduction in breast cancer mortality of 10-20% in women invited to screening before age 50 years, to estimate the number of deaths that could be prevented. The net change in breast cancer deaths was defined as the number of radiation-induced deaths minus the number of prevented deaths. For all women, assuming a reduction in mortality from screening of 20%, a decade of annual screening was estimated to induce more deaths than it prevents if started at age 20 years and at age 30 years (net increase = 0.86 and 0.37 breast cancer deaths, respectively, per 1000 women screened). The corresponding estimate for screening starting at age 40 years was a net decrease of 0.46 deaths/1000 women screened and a zero net change assuming a 10% mortality reduction. Results for women with first-degree relatives with breast cancer were generally in the same direction but, because their background incidence rates are higher, the net increases or decreases were greater. In conclusion, our estimates suggest that a decade of annual two-view mammographic screening before age 40 years would result in a net increase in breast cancer deaths, and that starting at age 40 years could result in a material net decrease only if breast cancer mortality is reduced by about 20% or more in women screened. Although these calculations were based on a number of uncertain parameters, in general, the conclusions were not altered when these parameters were varied within a feasible range.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual UK age-specific breast cancer mortality rates (per 100 000) according to the age that women were when their breast cancer was diagnosed (20–29 up to 60–69 years).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated net change in breast cancer deaths per 1000 women screened in the UK according to age at starting decade of annual screening: all women and women with affected first degree-relatives. (A) Assuming a 10% mortality reduction, and (B) assuming a 20% mortality reduction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimates from the sensitivity analysis of the minimum and maximum net change in breast cancer deaths per 1000 women screened in the UK according to age at starting decade of annual screening: all women and women with affected first-degree relatives.

References

    1. Beemsterboer PMM, Warmerdam PG, Boer R, de Honing HJ (1998) Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance? J Med Screen 5: 81–87 - PubMed
    1. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13761–13766 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E (2004) Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 1432–1440 - PubMed
    1. Coleman MP, Babb P, Mayer D, Qiunn MJ, Sloggett A (1999) Cancer Survival Trends in England and Wales, 1971–1995: Deprivation and NHS Region (CDROM). London: Office for National Statistics
    1. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001) Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease. Lancet 358: 1389–1399 - PubMed