Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children
- PMID: 16142771
- DOI: 10.1002/bem.20136
Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children
Abstract
There has been a long and controversial debate on possible differences in electromagnetic (EM) energy absorption between adults and children during cell phone usage. Some published studies report higher specific absorption rate (SAR) in children and explain this based on smaller head size. More recently, age dependent changes of the dielectric tissue parameters have again ignited the discussion. This study intends to give a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge about the parameters and mechanisms affecting the exposure of the mobile phone user with special focus on the exposure of children. Discussed are the absorption mechanism, tissue parameters, the effect of the pinna, and the uncertainties associated with head models based on spheroids, scaled adult heads, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of children. The conclusions of the review do not support the assumption that the energy exposure increases due to smaller heads, but identifies open issues regarding the dielectric tissue parameters and the thickness of the pinna.
Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc
Similar articles
-
Modeling of RF head exposure in children.Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S19-30. doi: 10.1002/bem.20155. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005. PMID: 16142772 Review.
-
Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz.Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 21;50(18):4355-69. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/18/008. Epub 2005 Sep 7. Phys Med Biol. 2005. PMID: 16148398
-
The effect of increase in dielectric values on specific absorption rate (SAR) in eye and head tissues following 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz radio frequency (RF) exposure.Phys Med Biol. 2006 Mar 21;51(6):1463-77. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/007. Epub 2006 Mar 1. Phys Med Biol. 2006. PMID: 16510956
-
Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users.Phys Med Biol. 2010 Apr 7;55(7):1767-83. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/7/001. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Phys Med Biol. 2010. PMID: 20208098
-
Mechanisms for interaction between RF fields and biological tissue.Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S98-S106. doi: 10.1002/bem.20119. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005. PMID: 15931683 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of exposure to mobile telecommunication electromagnetic fields.Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011 May;161(9-10):233-9. doi: 10.1007/s10354-011-0882-x. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011. PMID: 21638214
-
Workgroup report: base stations and wireless networks-radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences.Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Mar;115(3):416-24. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9633. Epub 2006 Nov 6. Environ Health Perspect. 2007. PMID: 17431492 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jun;6(6):1778-98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6061778. Epub 2009 Jun 10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19578460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neural cell apoptosis induced by microwave exposure through mitochondria-dependent caspase-3 pathway.Int J Med Sci. 2014 Mar 9;11(5):426-35. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6540. eCollection 2014. Int J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24688304 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):887-896F. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.071852. Epub 2010 Oct 5. Bull World Health Organ. 2010. PMID: 21124713 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous