Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Sep 6;143(5):337-46.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00009.

Comparison of rosiglitazone and metformin for treating HIV lipodystrophy: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of rosiglitazone and metformin for treating HIV lipodystrophy: a randomized trial

Jeroen P H van Wijk et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 1;143(9):695. Dosage error in published abstract; MEDLINE/PubMed abstract corrected

Abstract

Background: The use of antiretroviral combination therapy in HIV has been associated with lipodystrophy and cardiovascular risk factors.

Objective: To compare the effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone and metformin for treating HIV lipodystrophy.

Design: An open, randomized, 6-month clinical trial.

Setting: University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Patients: 39 HIV-infected men with lipodystrophy.

Intervention: Rosiglitazone, 8 g/d, or metformin, 2 g/d [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED]

Measurements: Insulin sensitivity estimated by the oral glucose tolerance test, subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat measured by single-slice computed tomography, endothelial function measured by flow-mediated vasodilation, and fasting plasma measurements. Two patients in the metformin group withdrew from the study. Complete case analysis was performed.

Results: Compared with metformin, rosiglitazone increased subcutaneous abdominal fat (between-treatment change from baseline, 27 cm2 [95% CI, 7 cm2 to 46 cm2]) and visceral abdominal fat (between-treatment change from baseline, 24 cm2 [CI, 6 cm2 to 51 cm2]). The area under the curve for insulin after the oral glucose tolerance test decreased similarly with both agents, but only rosiglitazone increased adiponectin levels. Metformin showed greater benefits on fasting lipid profile than rosiglitazone. Flow-mediated vasodilation statistically significantly increased with metformin (mean change, 1.5% [CI, 0.4% to 3.3%]) and not with rosiglitazone (mean change, 0.7% [CI, -1.1% to 2.7%]). The metformin versus rosiglitazone increases did not statistically differ. Rosiglitazone and metformin did not change C-reactive protein levels.

Limitations: This small trial was not blinded or placebo-controlled and did not measure clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: The findings emphasize the importance of individualized care in HIV-infected patients. Although rosiglitazone may partly correct lipoatrophy, metformin improves visceral fat accumulation, fasting lipid profile, and endothelial function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Summary for patients in

Publication types

MeSH terms