Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens
- PMID: 16145162
- PMCID: PMC1234115
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4868-4871.2005
Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens
Abstract
We compared real-time LightCycler and TaqMan assays and the GP5+/6+ PCR/enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to assess the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) load in cervical scrape specimens. Both real-time PCR assays determined the HPV16 load in scrape specimens similarly. The level of agreement between these assays and the GP5+/6+ PCR/EIA was low (P = 0.004), suggesting that the latter method is not suited for quantifying HPV16 DNA.
Figures
References
-
- Cuzick, J., G. Terry, L. Ho, T. Hollingworth, and M. Anderson. 1992. Human papillomavirus type 16 in cervical smears as predictor of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [corrected]. Lancet 339:959-960. - PubMed
-
- Gravitt, P. E., R. D. Burk, A. Lorincz, R. Herrero, A. Hildesheim, M. E. Sherman, M. C. Bratti, A. C. Rodriguez, K. J. Helzlsouer, and M. Schiffman. 2003. A comparison between real-time polymerase chain reaction and hybrid capture 2 for human papillomavirus DNA quantitation. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 12:477-484. - PubMed
-
- Jacobs, M. V., P. J. Snijders, A. J. van den Brule, T. J. Helmerhorst, C. J. Meijer, and J. M. Walboomers. 1997. A general primer GP5+/GP6+-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:791-795. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
