Breast cancer underestimation rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core-needle biopsy under imaging guidance
- PMID: 16146248
Breast cancer underestimation rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core-needle biopsy under imaging guidance
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate breast cancer underestimation rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed by core-needle biopsy (CNB) under imaging guidance in Ramathibodi Hospital and to determine the difference between the malignant and benign groups in terms of clinical and imaging characteristics.
Material and method: The pathological records of 1521 patients who underwent CNB under imaging guidance were reviewed. Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with ADH were enrolled into the present study. Clinical data, imaging features, biopsy technique and result of excisional biopsy as well as follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed.
Results: Of 39 ADH cases, eight (20.5%) were found to have malignancy on subsequent excisional biopsy. The majority of these were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (62.5%). Lesion categorized as category 5 according to BI-RADS (Breast imaging reporting and data system) was the only feature which was statistically different between the benign and malignant groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the benign and malignant groups in terms of age, personal and family history of breast cancer, clinical finding, mammographic lesion type, size of lesion, image-guided technique and percentage of lesion removal.
Conclusion: The underestimation rate of ADH in the present study was comparable to other studies. The finding of Bl-RADS category 5 in patients with ADH diagnosed from CNB is a strong indication for subsequent excisional biopsy.
Similar articles
-
Lobular neoplasia on core-needle biopsy--clinical significance.Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):242-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20318. Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15241819
-
Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):813-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030874. Epub 2004 Apr 22. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15105449
-
Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions.Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):534-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.003. Am J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16978969
-
Factors affecting the under-diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsies - A 10-year retrospective study and review of the literature.Int J Surg. 2018 Jan;49:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29146271 Review.
-
Multivariate model to identify women at low risk of cancer upgrade after a core needle biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(2):295-304. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4253-1. Epub 2017 May 4. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28474262 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical predictors of malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Jun;13(2):184-191. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.73528. Epub 2018 Feb 15. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018. PMID: 30002750 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical