Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar;34(3):179-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Sep 8.

Load bearing capacity of fibre-reinforced and particulate filler composite resin combination

Affiliations

Load bearing capacity of fibre-reinforced and particulate filler composite resin combination

Sufyan Garoushi et al. J Dent. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Longevity of particulate filler resin (PFR) is controversial for large restorations with high occlusal-stresses. The aim of this study was to reinforce PFR with fiber reinforced composite (FRC) and to evaluate the effect of thickness of FRC substructure and thickness of overlaying PFR, on the static load-bearing capacity of the material combination.

Methods: A total of 336 test specimens having a FRC substructure (short random or continuous bidirectional fibre orientation) and layer of restorative PFR were prepared for this study. In Group A, the specimens contained short random oriented fibres (length: 2-3mm) and in Group B, there were continuous bidirectionally oriented fibres. The specimens (n = 12/group) were polymerized with a hand light-curing unit and were either dry-stored or thermocycled before they were statically loaded with a steel ball until fracture, using a universal testing machine.

Results: Increase the volume fraction of the short random FRC versus the fraction of PFR, the load-bearing capacity of the specimen increased (p < 0.001). Short random FRC revealed significantly different behavior than the bidirectionally oriented FRC (p < 0.001). By combining the FRC layer of 0.5mm in thickness with a layer of 2.5mm of PFR gave load values of 1462N and 1196N, which were considerably higher than values for plain PFR of 3mm in thickness (782N and 729N).

Conclusion: The results suggest that by adding a FRC substructure under the PFR, the load-bearing capacity of the material combination was increased.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources