Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):541.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.541.

Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT)

UKATT Research Team
Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT)

UKATT Research Team. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of social behaviour and network therapy, a new treatment for alcohol problems, with that of the proved motivational enhancement therapy.

Design: Pragmatic randomised trial.

Setting: Seven treatment sites around Birmingham, Cardiff, and Leeds.

Participants: 742 clients with alcohol problems; 689 (93.0%) were interviewed at three months and 617 (83.2%) at 12 months.

Interventions: Social behaviour and network therapy and motivational enhancement therapy.

Main outcome measures: Changes in alcohol consumption, alcohol dependence, and alcohol related problems over 12 months.

Results: Both groups reported substantial reductions in alcohol consumption, dependence, and problems, and better mental health related quality of life over 12 months. Between groups we found only one significant difference in outcome, probably due to chance: the social network group showed significantly better physical health at three months. Non-significant differences at 12 months in the motivational group relative to the social network group included: the number of drinks consumed per drinking day had decreased by an extra 1.1 (95% confidence interval -1.0 to 3.2); scores on the Leeds dependence questionnaire had improved by an extra 0.6 (-0.7 to 2.0); scores on the alcohol problems questionnaire had improved by an extra 0.5 (-0.4 to 1.4); but the number of days abstinent from drinking had increased by 1.2% less (-4.5% to 6.9%).

Conclusion: The novel social behaviour and network therapy for alcohol problems did not differ significantly in effectiveness from the proved motivational enhancement therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Singleton N, Bumpstead R, O'Brien M, Lee A, Meltzer H. Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households in 2000. London: Stationery Office, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Leontaridi R. Alcohol misuse: how much does it cost? London: Cabinet Office, 2003. www.strategy.gov.uk/files/pdf/econ.pdf (accessed 25 April 2005).
    1. Alcohol Concern. Report on the mapping of alcohol services in England. London: Alcohol Concern, 2002.
    1. Chick J, Ritson MB, Connaughton J, Stewart A, Chick J. Advice versus extended treatment for alcoholism: controlled study. Br J Addict 1988;83: 159-70. - PubMed
    1. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: project MATCH post-treatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997;58: 7-29. - PubMed