Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Oct;33(10):745-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.08.001.

[Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

[Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity]

[Article in French]
C Huchon et al. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate postoperative morbidity with non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during caesarean section.

Patients and methods: A prospective randomized study of 170 patients. Operative time, postoperative pain, postoperative morbidity (febrile morbidity, wound haematoma, wound infection, postoperative ileus) and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.

Results: Duration of operation was significantly shorter without peritoneal closure (38.89 vs 42.00 minutes; P<0.05). Wound haematoma were more frequent when peritoneum was closed (P<0.029). There were no significant difference between the two groups for postoperative ileus, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain and other complications.

Discussion and conclusion: We report the first French study on this subject. In this study, non-closure of both visceral and parietal peritoneum is associated with shorter operation duration and seems to reduce immediate complications. A long-term evaluation of morbidity, regarding adhesions is necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources