Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality
- PMID: 16156188
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03193070
Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality
Abstract
The classical phonological similarity effect (PSE) was studied with words and nonwords in two immediate serial recall (ISR) tasks. The relative contributions of intralist and interlist interference were compared, and differential effects on item and order memory were observed. PSE occurred with words and was reversed with nonwords. In addition, PSE was modulated by interlist similarity, which enhanced recall of rhyme items and impaired recall of distinct items. Finally, interlist similarity reduced item recall of words, whereas it improved serial recall of nonwords. The latter finding rules out the hypothesis that the reverse PSE for nonwords is due to interlist interference. It is concluded that two opposing effects of phonological intralist similarity cause the interaction between PSE and lexicality in ISR. With words, the positive effect on item recall is usually masked by a much more disruptive effect on position accuracy. With nonwords, however, the positive effect often masks the negative one. These findings are discussed in relation to current models of verbal short-term memory.
Similar articles
-
Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.Mem Cognit. 2004 Mar;32(2):223-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03196854. Mem Cognit. 2004. PMID: 15190715
-
Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?Psychol Res. 2007 Jul;71(4):448-57. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0042-2. Epub 2006 Jan 14. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16416144
-
Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.Memory. 2004 May;12(3):314-37. doi: 10.1080/096582103440000426. Memory. 2004. PMID: 15279435
-
The Working Memory Model and the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Feb;78(2):310-336. doi: 10.1177/17470218241282093. Epub 2024 Nov 1. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025. PMID: 39223965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):665-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026337. Epub 2011 Dec 5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012. PMID: 22141748 Review.
Cited by
-
Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.Mem Cognit. 2004 Mar;32(2):223-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03196854. Mem Cognit. 2004. PMID: 15190715
-
Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?Psychol Res. 2007 Jul;71(4):448-57. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0042-2. Epub 2006 Jan 14. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16416144