Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter
- PMID: 16158802
Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare saliva buffer capacity using a hand-held pH meter and a commercial buffer strip in patients at risk of caries.
Methods: To obtain stimulated saliva, 109 patients were given a paraffin wax to chew for 5 minutes. After reading the pH value of 0.5 ml of tested saliva using a portable hand-held pH meter (B-212), 10 microl of 0.1N HCl was titrated into the obtained saliva up to a total titration of 160 microl, and then the pH value read each time. The commercial buffer strip (CRT) was also evaluated. The correlation in ranking results (high, medium, low) between the B-212 pH meter and CRT buffer were statistically analyzed by the Bartlett's test (P < 0.001).
Results: At the point of 50 microd of titrated HCl, the individual saliva buffer capacities were ranked into one of the following three categories; high (above pH 5.5), medium (pH from 5.5 to 4.5) and low (below pH 4.5). The percentages of the tested patients for the different ranks (high, medium, low) of buffer capacity were 50%, 17% and 33% respectively for the B-212 pH meter, and 56%, 17% and 27% respectively for the CRT. For the CRT buffer, 23 out of 109 cases showed inconclusive color change under the colorimetric test. There was significant correlation between ranking buffer capacity measured by the B-212 pH meter and the CRT buffer (P < 0.001).
Similar articles
-
Comparative analysis of three commercial saliva testing kits with a standard saliva buffering test.Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):140-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00023.x. Aust Dent J. 2008. PMID: 18494969
-
Quantitative assessment for stimulated saliva flow rate and buffering capacity in relation to different ages.J Dent. 2006 Oct;34(9):716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Feb 28. J Dent. 2006. PMID: 16504365
-
Relationship between quantitative assessments of salivary buffering capacity and ion activity product for hydroxyapatite in relation to cariogenic potential.Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):167-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00027.x. Aust Dent J. 2008. PMID: 18494973
-
Comparative analysis of CRT Buffer, GC saliva check buffer tests and laboratory titration to evaluate saliva buffering capacity.Stomatologija. 2011;13(2):55-61. Stomatologija. 2011. PMID: 21822046
-
[Review of pH measurement (4): pH meter and glass electrode Q & A].Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 1998 May;43(6):799-804. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 1998. PMID: 9612074 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effects of a food enriched with probiotics on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. salivary counts in preschool children: a cluster randomized trial.J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 May 14;26:e20170318. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0318. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018. PMID: 29768525 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of three strip-type tests and two laboratory methods for salivary buffering analysis.Odontology. 2012 Jan;100(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0018-1. Epub 2011 May 10. Odontology. 2012. PMID: 21556727
-
Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion is significantly lower in non-erosive reflux disease patients than in healthy controls.Esophagus. 2024 Jan;21(1):76-82. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01025-9. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Esophagus. 2024. PMID: 37843630
-
Saliva secretion is reduced in mild reflux esophagitis patients.Esophagus. 2022 Apr;19(2):351-359. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00880-8. Epub 2021 Sep 18. Esophagus. 2022. PMID: 34536162
-
A clinical study to compare between resting and stimulated whole salivary flow rate and pH before and after complete denture placement in different age groups.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):356-66. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164907. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015. PMID: 26929540 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials