Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 16160131
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1233
Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial
Erratum in
- JAMA. 2008 Feb 27;299(8):899-900
Abstract
Context: Clinically localized prostate cancer is very prevalent among US men, but recurrence after treatment with conventional radiation therapy is common.
Objective: To evaluate the hypothesis that increasing the radiation dose delivered to men with clinically localized prostate cancer improves disease outcome.
Design, setting, and patients: Randomized controlled trial of 393 patients with stage T1b through T2b prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels less than 15 ng/mL randomized between January 1996 and December 1999 and treated at 2 US academic institutions. Median age was 67 years and median PSA level was 6.3 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 5.5 (range, 1.2-8.2) years.
Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive external beam radiation to a total dose of either 70.2 Gy (conventional dose) or 79.2 Gy (high dose). This was delivered using a combination of conformal photon and proton beams.
Main outcome measure: Increasing PSA level (ie, biochemical failure) 5 years after treatment.
Results: The proportions of men free from biochemical failure at 5 years were 78.8% [corrected] (95% confidence interval, 73.1%-84.6%) [corrected] for conventional-dose and 91.3% [corrected] (95% confidence interval, 87.2%-95.4%) [corrected] for high-dose therapy (P<.001), a 59% [corrected] reduction in the risk of failure. The advantage to high-dose therapy was statistically significant [corrected] in both the low-risk subgroup [corrected] (risk reduction, 84% [P<.001]) [corrected] There has been no significant difference in overall survival rates between the treatment groups. Only 1% of patients receiving conventional-dose and 2% receiving high-dose radiation experienced acute urinary or rectal morbidity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 3 or greater. So far, only 2% and 1%, respectively, have experienced late morbidity of RTOG grade 3 or greater.
Conclusions: Men with clinically localized prostate cancer have a lower risk of biochemical failure if they receive high-dose rather than conventional-dose conformal radiation. This advantage was achieved without any associated increase in RTOG grade 3 acute or late urinary or rectal morbidity.
Comment in
-
Radiation dose escalation as treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: is more really better?JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1274-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1274. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16160137 No abstract available.
-
Correction: Inaccurate analysis and results in a study of radiation therapy in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.JAMA. 2008 Feb 27;299(8):898-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.8.898-c. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18314431 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
