Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification
- PMID: 16161803
- DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200410134
Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification
Abstract
The comparison of the efficiency of two binary diagnostic tests requires one to know the disease status for all patients in the sample, by applying a gold standard. In two-phase studies the gold standard is not applied to all patients in a sample, and the problem of partial verification of the disease arises. At present, one of the approaches most used for comparing two binary diagnostic tests are the likelihood ratios. In this study, the maximum likelihood estimators of likelihood ratios are obtained. The tests of hypothesis to compare the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests when both are applied to the same random sample in the presence of verification bias are deduced, and simulation experiments are performed in order to investigate the asymptotic behaviour of the tests of hypothesis. The results obtained have been applied to the study of Alzheimer's disease.
Similar articles
-
Approximate confidence intervals for the likelihood ratios of a binary diagnostic test in the presence of partial disease verification.J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(1):56-81. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1452025. Epub 2018 Mar 27. J Biopharm Stat. 2019. PMID: 29584541
-
Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):409-16. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200310159. Biom J. 2005. PMID: 16161800
-
Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1251-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.2433. Stat Med. 2006. PMID: 16345029
-
Evidence-based emergency medicine/skills for evidence-based emergency care. Interval likelihood ratios: another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician.Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;42(2):292-7. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.274. Ann Emerg Med. 2003. PMID: 12883521 Review.
-
Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: A tutorial using R.Stat Med. 2022 Apr 30;41(9):1709-1727. doi: 10.1002/sim.9311. Epub 2022 Jan 18. Stat Med. 2022. PMID: 35043447 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223832. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31603953 Free PMC article.
-
A hybrid Bayesian hierarchical model combining cohort and case-control studies for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: Accounting for partial verification bias.Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Dec;25(6):3015-3037. doi: 10.1177/0962280214536703. Epub 2014 May 26. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016. PMID: 24862512 Free PMC article.
-
Potential risk factors associated with the development of synechiae following functional endoscopic sinus surgery.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;275(5):1175-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4936-1. Epub 2018 Mar 15. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29546557
-
The cost-effectiveness of reclassification sampling for prevalence estimation.PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032058. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22348146 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical