Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Mar;55(3):356-61.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.062554. Epub 2005 Sep 14.

Treatment of active Crohn's disease in children using partial enteral nutrition with liquid formula: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment of active Crohn's disease in children using partial enteral nutrition with liquid formula: a randomised controlled trial

T Johnson et al. Gut. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aims: Total enteral nutrition (TEN) with a liquid formula can suppress gut inflammation and induce remission in active Crohn's disease. The mechanism is obscure. Studies have suggested that long term nutritional supplementation with a liquid formula (partial enteral nutrition (PEN)) may also suppress inflammation and prevent relapse. The aim of this study was to compare PEN with conventional TEN in active Crohn's disease.

Patients and methods: Fifty children with a paediatric Crohn's disease activity index (PCDAI)>20 were randomly assigned to receive 50% (PEN) or 100% (TEN) of their energy requirement as elemental formula for six weeks. The PEN group was encouraged to eat an unrestricted diet while those receiving TEN were not allowed to eat. The primary outcome was achievement of remission (PCDAI<10). Secondary analyses of changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein, albumin, and platelets were performed to look for evidence of anti-inflammatory effects.

Results: Remission rate with PEN was lower than with TEN (15% v 42%; p=0.035). Although PCDAI fell in both groups (p=0.001 for both), the reduction was greater with TEN (p=0.005). Moreover, the fall in PCDAI with PEN was due to symptomatic and nutritional benefits. With both treatments there were significant improvements in relation to abdominal pain, "sense of wellbeing", and nutritional status. However, only TEN led to a reduction in diarrhoea (p=0.02), an increase in haemoglobin and albumin, and a fall in platelets and ESR.

Conclusions: TEN suppresses inflammation in active Crohn's disease but PEN does not. This suggests that long term nutritional supplementation, although beneficial to some patients, is unlikely to suppress inflammation and so prevent disease relapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. O'Sullivan M, O'Morain C. Nutritional treatments in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 20014207–213. - PubMed
    1. Forbes A. Review article: Crohn's disease—the role of nutritional therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 200216(suppl 4)48–52. - PubMed
    1. Fernandez‐Banares F, Cabre E, Esteve‐Comas M.et al How effective is enteral nutrition in inducing clinical remission in active Crohn's disease? A meta‐analysis of the randomized clinical trials. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 199519356–364. - PubMed
    1. Messori A, Trallori G, D'Albasio G.et al Defined‐formula diets versus steroids in the treatment of active Crohn's disease: a meta‐analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 199631267–272. - PubMed
    1. Griffiths A M, Ohlsson A, Sherman P M.et al Meta‐analysis of enteral nutrition as a primary treatment of active Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 19951081056–1067. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances