Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Dec;35(12):1186-95.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1570-z. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shifts for assessment of appendicitis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shifts for assessment of appendicitis

Andrea S Doria et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Assessment of appendicitis during a weeknight or weekend shift (after-hours period, AHP) might be more costly and less effective than its assessment on a weekday shift (standard hours period, SHP) because of increased costs (staff premium fees) and perforation risk (longer delays and less experience of fellows).

Objectives: The objectives were to compare the costs and effectiveness of assessing children with suspected appendicitis who required a laparotomy and had US or CT after-hours with those of assessing children during standard hours, and to evaluate the importance of diagnostic imaging (DI) within the overall costs.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively microcosted resource use within six areas of a tertiary hospital (emergency [ED], diagnostic imaging (DI), surgery, wards, transport, and pathology) in a tertiary hospital. About 41 children (1.8-17 years) in the AHP and 35 (2.9-16 years) in the SHP were evaluated. Work shift effectiveness was measured with a histological score that assessed the severity of appendicitis (non-perforated appendicitis: scores 1-3; perforated appendicitis: score 4).

Results: The SHP was less costly and more effective regardless of whether the calculation included US or CT costs only. For a salary-based fee schedule, 733 US dollars were saved per case of perforated appendicitis averted in the SHP. For a fee-for-service payment schedule, 847 dollars were saved. Within the overall budget, the highest costs were those incurred on the ward for both shifts. The average cost per patient in DI ranged from 2 to 5% of the total costs in both shifts. Most perforation cases were found in the AHP (31.7%, AHP vs. 17.1%, SHP), which resulted in higher ward costs for patients in the AHP.

Conclusion: A higher proportion of severe cases was seen in the AHP, which led to its higher costs. As a result, the SHP dominated the AHP, being less costly and more effective regardless of the fee schedule applied. The DI costs contributed little to the overall cost of the assessment of appendicitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):53-62 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 2002 Jun;40(6):530-9 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2001 Dec;221(3):755-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1996 Nov 20;276(19):1589-94 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):663-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms