Similar articles

• Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: here's a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias.

  Glymour MM, Kawachi I. Glymour MM, et al. BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):638. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.638-a. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 16166149 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care.

  Kranke P. Kranke P. BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):638. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.638. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 16166150 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: systematic review is needed.

  Forbes RB, McCarron M. Forbes RB, et al. BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):638. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.638-c. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 16166147 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias.

  Dubben HH, Beck-Bornholdt HP. Dubben HH, et al. BMJ. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):433-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38478.497164.F7. Epub 2005 Jun 3. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15937056 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias.

  Opthof T, Coronel R, Janse MJ. Opthof T, et al. Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Dec;56(3):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00712-5. Cardiovasc Res. 2002. PMID: 12445872 Review. No abstract available.