Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jan;32(1):179-94.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi048. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

Cognitive deficits in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients: a meta-analytic review of putative endophenotypes

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive deficits in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients: a meta-analytic review of putative endophenotypes

Beth E Snitz et al. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Cognitive deficits may index genetic liability for schizophrenia and are candidate endophenotypes for the illness. In order to compare the degree of sensitivity among cognitive tasks to group differences between healthy relatives and controls and the influence of moderator variables, this review reports mean effect sizes for 43 cognitive test scores from 58 studies of cognitive performance in the unaffected adult relatives of schizophrenia patients. Results indicate reliable relative-control differences, in the small to medium effect size range, over a diverse array of tasks, with the largest effect sizes seen in complex versions of continuous performance tasks, auditory verbal learning, design copy tests, and category fluency. Three study design features were found to have significant effects on overall effect size magnitude: groups unmatched on education, groups unmatched on age, and asymmetric psychiatric exclusion criteria. After excluding studies with the latter 2 design features, reliable performance differences were still observed over a smaller subset of cognitive test variables, with the largest effect sizes seen in Trails B (d = 0.50) and performance measures from both simple (d = 0.56) and complex (d = 0.60-0.66) versions of continuous performance tasks. Four of the 6 largest effect sizes reflect tasks with high executive control demands in common, such as working memory demands, set shifting, and inhibition of prepotent responses. Cognitive deficits, particularly those tapping such executive control functions, should continue to prove valuable as endophenotypes of interest in the search for specific genetic factors related to schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean effect sizes (d) for 43 cognitive test variables in order of magnitude. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; n = number of effect sizes included per variable. See table 1 for abbreviations.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Mean effect sizes (d) for 24 cognitive test variables in order of magnitude, after excluding studies with non-age-matched groups and/or asymmetric exclusion criteria. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; n = number of effect sizes included per variable. See table 1 for abbreviations.

References

    1. Gottesman, Shields J. Schizophrenia and Genetics: A Twin Study Vantage Point. New York: Academic Press; 1972.
    1. Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, et al. Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(12):6917–6922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leonard S, Gault J, Hopkins J, et al. Association of promoter variants in the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit gene with an inhibitory deficit found in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiat. 2002;59(12):1085–1096. - PubMed
    1. Gottesman, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiat. 2003;160:636–645. - PubMed
    1. Bilder RM, Lipschutz-Broch L, Reiter G, Geisler SH, Mayerhoff DI, Liberman JA. Intellectual deficits in first-episode schizophrenia: evidence for progressive deterioration. Schizophrenia Bull. 1992;18:437–448. - PubMed