Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Jun;65(6):961-6.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.201.

A method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients: replication of the factor structure

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

A method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients: replication of the factor structure

J M Bliss et al. Br J Cancer. 1992 Jun.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The psychometric properties of a method of measuring the quality of life of cancer patients based on multiple linear analogue scales have been assessed in a group of 294 patients with breast cancer attending one clinical unit. The method was found to be readily managed by patients although a small number of scales presented difficulties of understanding to patients and difficulties of analysis. The scales distinguished readily between patients of different disease and treatment status. Factor analysis revealed a 5 factor structure which we interpret as relating to physical activities of everyday living, emotional disturbance, alimentary disturbances, appearance and cosmetic problems and a fifth factor which is more difficult to interpret and includes impairment of speech, writing and concentration. We feel the essential factors determining quality of life in cancer patients have been demonstrated in this and our earlier studies and there is now a substantial level of agreement in the factors that have been identified by groups taking quite different approaches. The major factors determining quality of life in cancer patients are now known and should be assessed in clinical research and clinical trials. The method by which they should be assessed is not as yet so clear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Cancer. 1990 Dec;62(6):1034-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1989 Sep;60(3):437-40 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Surv. 1987;6(3):521-43 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 1986 Mar;79(3):165-9 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787-805 - PubMed

Publication types