Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;89(10):1335-40.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.062471.

Orbital exenteration: a 13 year Manchester experience

I Rahman  1 , A E Cook, B Leatherbarrow
Affiliations

Orbital exenteration: a 13 year Manchester experience

I Rahman et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Background/aims: Orbital exenteration is a psychologically and anatomically disfiguring procedure reserved for the treatment of potentially life threatening malignancies or relentlessly progressive conditions unresponsive to other treatments. In this study the authors aimed to review their experience with exenteration, including indications, outcomes, and reasons for the increased rate of exenterations over the past 15 months.

Method: This retrospective study reviewed operating department records via a computerised database to identify all patients who had undergone exenteration of the orbit from 1 January 1991 to 1 April 2004 inclusive, at the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. Where case records were unavailable, attempts were made to obtain patient data from general practitioners, local health authorities, and referring hospitals.

Results: 69 orbits of 68 patients were identified. The mean age of the cohort was 68.2 years, with 33 males and 35 females having undergone exenterations. In total, 31 patients had previously undergone treatments undertaken by the referring specialty with a mean time from the primary procedure to exenteration of 115 months. 14 different tumours were encountered, of which basal cell carcinoma (28), melanoma (10), sebaceous cell carcinoma (nine), and squamous cell carcinoma (six) were the most common. An increasing incidence was observed in cases of BCCs requiring exenteration. 30 patients received orbital prosthesis within an 11 month period post-exenteration.

Conclusion: Exenteration is a procedure performed with increasing frequency in this unit over the past 15 months, the majority the result of BCCs. A large proportion of these exenterations had undergone previous treatments under a variety of non-ophthalmic specialties in other units. Exenterations are disfiguring procedures that may, therefore, be reduced in incidence by aggressive removal at the time of primary removal. Once performed, the cosmetic rehabilitation is long, with multiple postoperative visits, independent of the method used to close the orbital defect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of exenteration patients over 13 year period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Patient before facial prosthesis. (B) Patient with facial prosthesis. (Pictures reproduced with permission of patient and her parents.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bartisch G. Ophthalmodoulcia. Dresden 1583;3:208.
    1. Rose GE, Wright JE. Exenteration for benign orbital disease. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:14–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheilds JA, Sheilds CL, Suvarnamani C, et al. Orbital exenteration with eyelid sparing: indications, technique and results. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22:292–7. - PubMed
    1. Frezotti R, Nuti A. Repair after orbital exenteration. Acta Neurochir 1982;60:119–24. - PubMed
    1. Shore JW, Burks WR, Leone C, et al. Dermis fat graft for orbital exenteration after subtotal exenteration. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;102:228–36. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms