Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Sep;181(9):595-600.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-005-1406-7.

[Effectiveness and toxicity of reirradiation (Re-RT) for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Effectiveness and toxicity of reirradiation (Re-RT) for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)]

[Article in German]
Dirk Rades et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiation myelopathy is a serious late toxicity after radiotherapy (RT) of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). The risk of myelopathy depends on the equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). Many radiation oncologists are concerned about spinal Re-RT, because it may result in a high cumulative EQD2. This study investigates effectiveness and feasibility of Re-RT for in-field recurrence of MSCC.

Patients and methods: 74 patients, irradiated between 01/1995 and 12/2003 for MSCC, were reirradiated for in-field recurrence of MSCC (Table 1). Primary RT was performed with 1 x 8 Gy (n = 34), 5 x 4 Gy (n = 28), 10 x 3 Gy (n = 4), 15 x 2.5 Gy (n = 4), or 20 x 2 Gy (n = 4). Recurrence occurred after median 6 months (2-40 months). Re-RT was performed with 1 x 8 Gy (n = 35), 5 x 3 Gy (n = 16), 5 x 4 Gy (n = 13), 10 x 2 Gy (n = 4), 12 x 2 Gy (n = 3), or 17 x 1.8 Gy (n = 3). Cumulative EQD2 (alpha/beta = 2 Gy) was 39-40 Gy (n = 21), 49-50 Gy (n = 41), 56-60 Gy (n = 6), or > 60 Gy (n = 6). Follow-up after Re-RT was median 9 months (2-52 months).

Results: Re-RT led to an improvement of motor function in 29/74 patients (39%; Figures 1 to 3). On multivariate analysis, outcome was significantly influenced by type of primary tumor (p = 0.013) and by the time of developing motor deficits before Re-RT (p = 0.037), but not by radiation schedule (p = 0.560), by ambulatory status before Re-RT (p = 0.471), by cumulative EQD2 (p = 0.795), nor by the interval between primary RT and Re-RT (p = 0.420; Table 2). Radiation myelopathy was not observed in the whole series.

Conclusion: Re-RT is an effective treatment for an in-field recurrence of MSCC. After a cumulative EQD2 < or = 50 Gy, radiation myelopathy appears unlikely.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources