Abdominal sacral colpopexy: an independent prospective long-term follow-up study
- PMID: 16171482
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00459.x
Abdominal sacral colpopexy: an independent prospective long-term follow-up study
Abstract
Aims: The aim of the study was to provide a long-term follow up of subjective and objective outcomes following sacral colpopexy.
Methods: A cohort of 148 women who had undergone sacral colpopexy in a tertiary unit between 1998 and 2001 were contacted for follow-up. Women were questioned about current symptoms including patient determined subjective measures and the Baden-Walker site specific examination for vaginal prolapse was performed.
Results: Ninety-three women were able to be contacted for review. Of these, 64 were available for clinical examination and a further 29 were available for telephone interview. Of those women examined 62 had good vault support. Therefore, recurrent vault prolapse was uncommon at 3%. Recurrent prolapse was present in other vaginal compartments in 40.6% of women. Subjectively 78% of women felt that their prolapse symptoms had resolved and 65% had a visual analogue score (VAS) >or= 80, indicating satisfaction with the surgery. Stress urinary incontinence symptoms decreased at this long-term review, however, 24% of women required further incontinence surgery.
Conclusions: Abdominal sacral colpopexy is an effective technique for the management of vaginal vault prolapse, with a two-year successful outcome in excess of 90%. Further study is required to investigate recurrent prolapse in other vaginal compartments and the functional aspects following surgery.
Similar articles
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
-
Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.031. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14749629 Clinical Trial.
-
Recurrent pelvic floor defects after abdominal sacral colpopexy.J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1010-3; discussion 1013. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00328-9. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16469605
-
Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material--experience and results.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.005. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17848318
-
Surgical management of uterine prolapse.Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Dec;60(6):493-507. Minerva Ginecol. 2008. PMID: 18981977 Review.
Cited by
-
Experimental biomechanical evaluation of polypropylene prostheses used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 May;20(5):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0825-x. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. PMID: 19221679
-
Apical prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1815-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2172-1. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 24142057 Review.
-
Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1859-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2177-9. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 24142061 Review.
-
Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.J Midlife Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):169-72. doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.172305. J Midlife Health. 2015. PMID: 26903757 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function.Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Jul;17(7):373-390. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0334-8. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Nat Rev Urol. 2020. PMID: 32555435 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical