Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction
- PMID: 16171940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.004
Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction
Abstract
Objective: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty has been quoted to have equivalent success rates to the traditional open procedure in the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). The aim of this study was to report our experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Patients and methods: All patients with PUJO are entered into a database to record patient, operative and post-operative details. Over an eleven-year period, 176 procedures were performed. Eighty-three procedures were dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasties, of which two retroperitoneal procedures were converted to open. The first 17 procedures were performed via the retroperitoneal approach and the following 66 via the transperitoneal route. Thirty-one procedures were open pyeloplasty.
Results: The retroperitoneal group had a mean follow up of 35 (16-66) months. Five patients (33%) developed recurrent symptoms with evidence of obstruction seen on the renogram within 4 months and required further surgery. The transperitoneal group had a mean follow up of 15 (3-38) months. Five patients were classified as failures (mean time to failure 4.6 months) resulting in a success rate of 92% for the transperitoneal route. Both groups had a mean post-operative hospital stay of 3.6 days. Open pyeloplasty at our institution has a success rate of 88% at a mean follow up of 85 months (range 3-260 months) and a mean length of post-operative stay of 6 days.
Conclusion: Overall our success rate following laparoscopic pyeloplasty is 88%. However, our preferred approach is transperitoneal, which is associated with a success rate of 92%. This is equivalent, if not better than that seen following open pyeloplasty with the additional benefits of reduced hospital stay and time to recovery. There are many possible explanations for this difference in success rates between approaches, however equivalent results are reported in the literature and therefore the learning curve is likely to be the major factor in this series.
Similar articles
-
Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.200. Epub 2007 Aug 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17707427
-
Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):880-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07032.x. Epub 2007 May 29. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17535275
-
Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(8):1024-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07323.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7. BJU Int. 2008. PMID: 18070175
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status.BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95 Suppl 2:102-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05208.x. BJU Int. 2005. PMID: 15720343 Review.
-
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19519760 Review.
Cited by
-
Antegrade stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty: feasibility of the technique and time required for stent insertion.Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1831-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0272-7. Epub 2009 Jan 1. Surg Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19118431
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of different minimal invasive pyeloplasty in treating patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a network meta-analysis.World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2659-2669. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04559-w. Epub 2023 Aug 11. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37566142
-
Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Jun 15;41:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.009. eCollection 2022 Jul. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35813254 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00366. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00366. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 25392671 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the updated McMaster University experience.Can Urol Assoc J. 2008 Aug;2(4):388-91. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.806. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008. PMID: 18781214 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources