Examining the developing bone: What do we measure and how do we do it?
- PMID: 16172512
Examining the developing bone: What do we measure and how do we do it?
Abstract
The clinical tools available to evaluate bone development in children are often ambiguous, and difficult to interpret. Unfortunately bone densitometry methods (i.e., dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) which have a relatively straightforward application in adult osteoporosis, are far more difficult to evaluate in the growing skeleton. Even with adequate "adjustment" for bone size or maturity, bone "density" (areal or volumetric) alone often gives an inaccurate assessment of bone strength--especially in children. Ideally, we would like to measure both material and geometric properties of bone to accurately estimate "strength". Mechanically meaningful measures of bone geometry (bone cross-sectional area, cortical thickness) and estimates of bending strength (section modulus, or SSI) are available with non-invasive techniques such as (p)QCT and some DXA software. With new technology it might be possible to also measure bone material properties, which will be especially important in some pediatric disorders. In children, we also need to know something about the loads imposed on a child's bone and consider not only absolute bone strength, but also the strength of bone relative to the physiologic loads. Interpreting bone strength in light of the loads imposed (particularly muscle force) is critical for an accurate diagnosis of the developing bone.
Similar articles
-
Bone strength in pure bending: bearing of geometric and material properties.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;133:230-7. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008. PMID: 18431855
-
From mechanostat theory to development of the "Functional Muscle-Bone-Unit".J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005 Jul-Sep;5(3):232-8. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005. PMID: 16172514 Review.
-
The effect of exercise and nutrition on the mechanostat.J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005 Jul-Sep;5(3):239-54. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005. PMID: 16172515 Review.
-
Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.Bone. 2008 May;42(5):982-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Jan 26. Bone. 2008. PMID: 18337201
-
Important determinants of bone strength: beyond bone mineral density.J Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Apr;12(2):70-7. doi: 10.1097/01.rhu.0000208612.33819.8c. J Clin Rheumatol. 2006. PMID: 16601540 Review.
Cited by
-
Muscle density predicts changes in bone density and strength: a prospective study in girls.J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2014 Jun;14(2):195-204. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2014. PMID: 24879023 Free PMC article.
-
Association between bone mass and fractures in children: a prospective cohort study.J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Sep;21(9):1489-95. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060601. J Bone Miner Res. 2006. PMID: 16939408 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computerized tomography with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring bone mineral density.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;71(6):778-781. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.178. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017. PMID: 27759063 Free PMC article.
-
Hip bone strength indices in overweight and control adolescent boys.J Bone Miner Metab. 2011 Nov;29(6):691-8. doi: 10.1007/s00774-011-0267-7. Epub 2011 Apr 7. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011. PMID: 21626089
-
Geometric indices of hip bone strength in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys.Osteoporos Int. 2012 May;23(5):1593-600. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1754-3. Epub 2011 Sep 1. Osteoporos Int. 2012. PMID: 21881968
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical